Huizinga's weapons were legally obtained
Newstimes
Updated: 03/28/2009 02:18:05 PM EDT
I was both saddened and angered by your front-page story about Luke Huizinga. Only days earlier, I personally supervised Luke, his friends and many others at a shooting range.
He conducted himself in a responsible and adult manner and never required any warning. His guns, which were the same he had at the range, were legally obtained and he worked hard to obtain the money for them.
I remember him at the workplace the day he turned legal age to buy those guns and how exciting a time it was for him to be reaching another level of responsibility as he grows into adulthood.
Seeing him cuffed on the front-page of your newspaper reinforced my opinion of your liberal bias. Calling two guns and five knives an arsenal is really nothing more than an exaggeration.
On any given day in Connecticut, there are perhaps hundreds of people with two guns legally in their cars on the highways, and some from out of state.
I do not believe showing him cuffed was necessary and only made him look bad, which he wasn't, but there's your bias.
Under federal law, anyone qualified to possess guns in their home state can legally transport guns across a state line, provided they are also qualified to possess those same guns at their destination.
Massachusetts has historically persecuted and harassed gun owners. I think they learned it from the British, who have now knighted the chief Massachusetts gun hater.
Sportsmen traveling to Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire to hunt or participate in shooting events are always fearful of being stopped and harassed.
Police charge you and it's your turn to prove your innocence to the judge, at a personal cost. When vindicated and released, that never gets reported.
Bill Guiffredo
NAUGATUCK