The Start of Deval's Smoke and Mirrors

JonJ

Moderator
NES Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
13,068
Likes
352
Location
Plymouth, MA
Feedback: 11 / 0 / 0
http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...trick_reiterates_pledge_to_add_1000_officers/

Patrick reiterates pledge to add 1,000 officers

By Steve Leblanc, Associated Press Writer | December 14, 2006

MANSFIELD, Mass. --In an address Thursday to a statewide police chiefs association, Gov.-elect Deval Patrick renewed his pledge to hire 1,000 new police officers statewide, but acknowledged some communities might not be able to immediately pay for the new officers.

"There are issues of how fast you can absorb that many new officers," Patrick said after speaking to the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association on Thursday. "There are questions about who needs what kind of deployment."

Patrick also said Thursday he is considering a former top lawyer for the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority as his new transportation secretary.

James Aloisi was an undersecretary of transportation in the mid-1980s and later served as general counsel for the Turnpike Authority, which oversaw construction of the Big Dig. Aloisi, a lawyer at the Boston law firm of Goulston & Storrs, later wrote a book about the massive construction project.

He also helped advise former Turnpike Chairman Matthew Amorello in the wake of last July's fatal accident in one of the Big Dig tunnels, helping convince Amorello his legal options were running out in the face of efforts by Gov. Mitt Romney to oust him. Amorello eventually resigned.

"He is a very strong and well-respected expert in transportation and I think anybody would be crazy not to think about him and I am thinking about him," said Patrick, but declined to say whether he had made a final decision.

Aloisi did not immediately return a phone call Thursday.

During the campaign for governor, Patrick criticized management of the Big Dig, blaming the fatal accident on what he called the Big Dig culture on Beacon Hill, "which is one of neglect and inaction, where politics is more important than governing."

"Deval Patrick must have ignored the rhetoric of his own campaign. Jim Aloisi has been a part of the 'Big Dig culture' from day one," said Brian Dodge, executive director of the state Republican Party.

On the firm's Web site, Aloisi is credited as "the principal author of landmark legislation to establish the statutory framework for the operation, maintenance and financing" of the Big Dig. He was also a lead negotiator in the creation of a public/private partnership to run the Rose Kennedy Greenway, a 30-acre park built where the former elevated Central Artery once stood.

The promise of 1,000 new officers was a key part of Patrick's public safety platform as a candidate for governor. Under the plan, the state would initially pay for the officers and gradually turn those costs over to cities and towns.

Patrick said he'll do whatever he can to ensure the proposal has "an ongoing commitment" of state funding. Patrick said he hopes the new officers can help cities and towns control guns and gang violence.

Plainville police chief Ned Merrick, who attended Thursday's event, said he believes his fellow chiefs support Patrick's plan. He said when the federal government tried a similar program under President Clinton, local communities understood that they would eventually have to pick up the cost of the new officers.

"It was never proposed that the federal government ... was going to pay 100 percent of a cops' salary forever," he said. "It was designed to be a partnership."

During the news conference after his speech, Patrick again defended his plans for his inauguration, include soliciting donations up to $50,000 from corporations for the event.

Patrick said the companies' donations will defray the costs for people who want to attend one of the dozen planned events. Most of the tickets for the events will cost $20 to $50. He said any corporate donors shouldn't expect any special access to the administration.

"There are a whole lot of companies who have ponied up who have access, anyway," Patrick said. "What we're taking about is making access to the inaugural for those who wouldn't normally have it, who don't spend $1,000 to come to some elegant evening."

Patrick also said he's looking forward to receiving the reports Friday of 15 working groups that have held more than 60 community meetings across the state to ask for the public's policy ideas on everything from education to economic development.

He said he would make the reports public and try to turn the best of the ideas into reality as he plans his term as the state's first Democratic governor in 16 years.

"Overwhelmingly the ideas that have been brought forward have been practical and thoughtful and serious," he said. "It hasn't been what in the 60's we used to say in school was the standard list of nonnegotiable demands."

And he still thinks he can help municipalities reduce property taxes![rofl]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A conservative estimate with salary and compensation.

$50K per officer * 1000 = $50,000,000

That's not too much money. I mean it's worth it if it saves one life right?
 
If the population of the state has been decreasing why do we need more officers?
Because crime is down due to our stringent the gun laws, right? Or do you think they need the extra manpower to chase the gun toting bad guys? Or is it to help stem the tide of illegals flooding into the Bay State? Wow, I sure feel better about the Devils…errrr Devals promises (not)!
 
Most of the towns can't afford the PD they have now, most money goes to the schools.

This scam was pulled years ago, and when the initial funding (state) dried up, lots of officers were laid off. Many had to leave MA to continue their LE careers.
 
Most of the towns can't afford the PD they have now, most money goes to the schools.

This scam was pulled years ago, and when the initial funding (state) dried up, lots of officers were laid off. Many had to leave MA to continue their LE careers.
That's pretty unfortunate and unfair. A similar thing happened to medical students under Clinton. All the students were studying to become GPs because under Clinton's socialized medical plan the GP was going to be the gateway to specialists and thousands of new GPs would be necessary. When his plan fell apart there were thousands of GPs with no jobs available.
 
Wonderful. The best thing is it won't have any effect on crime...

+1. While I believe that having a well staffed, well trained, police force
is a benefit to any community, there is this thing called the "law of
diminishing returns." Police can only be so "proactive" about fighting
crime, much in the way that firefighters can only do so much in terms of
fire prevention/awareness. Outside of the preventative effect, the
constabulary's utility is usually more of a reactionary one than anything
else, or to clean up the mess after a criminal has already committed
a crime to prevent them from committing other ones.

That "law" actually even applies to criminal justice in general. People
are living in fantasy land if they think the system can fully protect
them. There comes a cutoff point where you can only increase the
effect of the police if you're willing to turn your city/town into a police
state, of sorts. That might get you a few more bagged criminals, but at
a significant cost. And even that has its limits. (Think Iraq... we
have well trained guys with armored vehicles driving around with curfews in
some of these towns over there, and there is still plenty of sectarian
violence going on. ) Even in those parts of the world where they
cut peoples hands off for stealing a loaf of bread, bread is still being
stolen. Criminal Justice is flawed, much like anything else is. It doesn't
mean we should abandon the idea, but it does mean that people should
be more reasonable about what they actually expect the police to be
able to do. (I get the impression that spend it all Deval is treating law
enforcment as a panacea of sorts to all crime problems... )

I guess what I'm getting at, is while undoubedly there are many communities
in MA that need more officers, that "idea" by itself isn't enough. In many
places knocking down a row of crack houses will probably help the
community just as much as hiring a few new officers would.

I dunno... I'd rather see this money being used to pay for more
officers training/equipment and perhaps upgrade their salary with a
corresponding upgrade in standards, as well. At least when the money
goes away the knowledge or benefit might stick around. It does the
community very little good in the long term if you hire 10 police officers only
to have to let most of them go a few years later when the cash runs
out.

-Mike
 
Patrick said he hopes the new officers can help cities and towns control guns and gang violence.

[laugh2]

I have to laugh at this quote.... why are "Guns" separate from gang
violence? Are the guns walking around on the street by themselves
and attacking people? [shocked] More liberal "newspeak" to blame the device instead of the criminal pulling the trigger.

-Mike
 
You beat me to it :

" he hopes the new officers can help cities and towns control guns... "

I would hope the police can start better controlling professional criminals instead. My guns don't need controlling , they are very well behaved.
 
Because crime is down due to our stringent the gun laws, right? Or do you think they need the extra manpower to chase the gun toting bad guys? Or is it to help stem the tide of illegals flooding into the Bay State? Wow, I sure feel better about the Devils…errrr Devals promises (not)!

Funny , Vermont is a free carry state meaning anyone can carry open or concealed with no permit, look at the crime wave up there
 
Back
Top Bottom