![[smile]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/001.gif "Smile [smile]")
Last edited:
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
The proposed Executive Orders
- Thread starter mikeyp
- Start date
Here is a statement from my House rep, head of the judiciary committee:
“House Republicans welcome the recommendations of this task force and will consider them as the House continues to examine ways to prevent tragedies like the one in Newtown. However, good intentions do not necessarily make good laws, so as we investigate the causes and search for solutions, we must ensure that any proposed solutions will actually be meaningful in preventing the taking of innocent life and that they do not trample on the rights of law-abiding citizens to exercise their Constitutionally-guaranteed rights. We will take these recommendations into consideration as we continue to conduct our own inquiries into how to prevent these tragedies from happening.”
Translation: Your proposed solution will not work BO, and it will die in my committee.
“House Republicans welcome the recommendations of this task force and will consider them as the House continues to examine ways to prevent tragedies like the one in Newtown. However, good intentions do not necessarily make good laws, so as we investigate the causes and search for solutions, we must ensure that any proposed solutions will actually be meaningful in preventing the taking of innocent life and that they do not trample on the rights of law-abiding citizens to exercise their Constitutionally-guaranteed rights. We will take these recommendations into consideration as we continue to conduct our own inquiries into how to prevent these tragedies from happening.”
Translation: Your proposed solution will not work BO, and it will die in my committee.
Last edited:
Remember this is a public forum and we already have an AWB. What Devil does is up to him. I believe we will be fine. Gun grabbers really love playing that "gunshow loophole" game and they are closing that. Good, let them focus on that.
Last edited by a moderator:
Drgrant hit the nail on the head. If this is the worst of it then The Dear Leader has fired off a squib shot. Most of these items will either be ignored by states that don't set up Obamacare insurance exchanges, are a violation of the Firearms Owners Protection Act or can be litigated to death by 2nd Amendment activists. The feeble nature of these policies is an open admission by the current regime that it can't make good on it's alarming rhetoric.
In theory anyway, Congress could simply defund any of this. If you want to see what if anything Republicans are good for then demand that they defund all of these initiatives and see if they follow through. Hold their feet to the fire and let them know you expect them to protect your inalienable rights from these kinds of assaults. Don't let the bastards off the hook. That goes for the State level as well.
In theory anyway, Congress could simply defund any of this. If you want to see what if anything Republicans are good for then demand that they defund all of these initiatives and see if they follow through. Hold their feet to the fire and let them know you expect them to protect your inalienable rights from these kinds of assaults. Don't let the bastards off the hook. That goes for the State level as well.
Nearly all rifle ammo pierces armor (.22LR is the only exception that quickly comes to mind, excluding pistol-caliber rifles of course), so they hope to get rid of all rifles that could possibly put up a resistance against a tyrannical government. That's what it means.
#4. Could be the Trojan horse. Make millions unable to own firearms.
Would be disqualified by changing the rules
1. speeding
2. Threats
3. Public intoxication
4. In mass OUI ( now only after 1994 is a disqual)
5. Posting on pro gun web sites
What justifies a dangerous person.
Would be disqualified by changing the rules
1. speeding
2. Threats
3. Public intoxication
4. In mass OUI ( now only after 1994 is a disqual)
5. Posting on pro gun web sites
What justifies a dangerous person.
made this myself, share at will.
Would love to send this to everyone I know, but I can't verify 100% that this quote actually exists in Mein Kampf? Some googling suggests that the first half of it is, but the "the people will happily endure..." part is not. It's still a valid point, though.
http://sydwalker.info/blog/2008/12/08/having-fun-falsifying-history/
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
- Messages
- 7,080
- Likes
- 6,998
The game is clear, bannimg evil black rifles is icing/distraction you gotta watch the mental unsuitability schemes.
They are going all out.
Also not sure. Can an EO change law or would the part of law that describes
Prohib persons have to be rewritten Just wondering the way EO was written
Direct the AG to review categories of prohibited persons
Also not sure. Can an EO change law or would the part of law that describes
Prohib persons have to be rewritten Just wondering the way EO was written
Direct the AG to review categories of prohibited persons
#8 sounds like it may lead to in-home inspections...
![[angry2]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/019.gif "Angry2 [angry2]")
![[crying]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/006.gif "Crying [crying]")
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
Zis how you exe-cute!
Texas is pretty awesome, but they haven't passed anything as far as I can tell. A firearms freedom act, with teeth, has been introduced but not yet passed.
I'd love it if someone could prove me wrong though, maybe my google-fu has failed?
I'd love it if someone could prove me wrong though, maybe my google-fu has failed?
Yea, but that is what is bothering me. Keep in mind... if these guys are good at ANYTHING, it is being sneaky on their agenda and planting seeds that will bear rotten fruit later. These folks ARE NOT stupid, they are hardcore progressives that know how to play the long game.
Similar threads
