The President Trump Megathread

Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
20,257
Likes
8,488
Location
NH (CT Escapee)
Tariffs don't effect US govt debt. Though obviously it could influence further purchases. At this point China is under tough economic conditions and they have HK driving world awareness of how shitty they are. Now is the time to pressure them becuase while their economy is floundering they will need USD to help stabilize.
 

namedpipes

NES Member
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
31,649
Likes
13,955
Location
PREM
Tariffs don't effect US govt debt. Though obviously it could influence further purchases. At this point China is under tough economic conditions and they have HK driving world awareness of how shitty they are. Now is the time to pressure them becuase while their economy is floundering they will need USD to help stabilize.
No, I meant if their economy crumbles, does that make our dollar worth more (so we pay less) or less, so we pay more? Or something like that. I majored in home ec in college [laugh] Plus I'm a couple of eggnog n' rum (ok, rum n' eggnog) in.
 

Sauer Grapes

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Messages
3,656
Likes
2,514
Location
MetroWest
No, I meant if their economy crumbles, does that make our dollar worth more (so we pay less) or less, so we pay more? Or something like that. I majored in home ec in college [laugh] Plus I'm a couple of eggnog n' rum (ok, rum n' eggnog) in.
Extra points if you're drinking out of the moose mugs from Christmas Vacation
IMG_0650.JPG
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
657
Likes
25
Location
Hanover, NH
No, I meant if their economy crumbles, does that make our dollar worth more (so we pay less) or less, so we pay more? Or something like that. I majored in home ec in college [laugh] Plus I'm a couple of eggnog n' rum (ok, rum n' eggnog) in.
If their economy crumbles, then their currency will crumble along with it. We would be able to pay less for the same goods.
 

calsdad

NES Member
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
37,646
Likes
12,358
Location
Chelmsford MA

Trump should just take the next planned tariff increase, double it, and put it in place tomorrow. If China wont actually negotiate, just crush their economy into rubble.
Gotta be at least a little bit careful with embargoes, tariffs, blockades - and all the rest of that economic warfare stuff.

Economic warfare is what gave the Japanese the final push to attack the US and start the Pacific phase of WW2. People conveniently forget all of this and think that WW2 for the US started at Pearl Harbor which happened by magic somehow when the Japanese just woke up one day and decided to attack us for no reason.

The truth is that at least some of the reason why the Japanese started invading all over Asia - was to drive out the Europeans - who had invaded before. And then the Europeans -and the Americans - who saw their "interests" threatened - started screwing with the Japanese. The US had put an embargo on things like steel and oil against the Japanese, which was a real blow to the viability of their economy.

To my way of thinking the problem with all of this economic warfare stuff - is that the dumbass politicians announce it. It's one thing to come out and say to somebody "I think you suck so I'm going to cut the electric lines off your house, cut the gas lines in your car - and get your credit score ruined by telling banks you're a racist".

When you go and tell somebody "I'm going to screw you" - and then you go do it, you're setting up the stage for a war.

It's much better to just go screw them - and not tell them. They wake up one day and they have no power - and the lines are cut off their house. Their credit score is ruined - and they don't know why. You can get away with screwing somebody for a LONG time if you just don't announce it.

The Chinese and Mexicans have been doing it to us for DECADES.
 

namedpipes

NES Member
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
31,649
Likes
13,955
Location
PREM
I am thinking the old and hot pic is not the same person. The original pic is I think Fiona Apple, not Fiona Hill. Fiona Apple looks a little worse for the wear as well at this point.
Add ten years to ANYBODY named Fiona and they'll look 30 years older. Except for the character Fiona in Burn Notice.
 

jct61765

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
1,823
Likes
974
Location
New Hampshire
Gotta be at least a little bit careful with embargoes, tariffs, blockades - and all the rest of that economic warfare stuff.

Economic warfare is what gave the Japanese the final push to attack the US and start the Pacific phase of WW2. People conveniently forget all of this and think that WW2 for the US started at Pearl Harbor which happened by magic somehow when the Japanese just woke up one day and decided to attack us for no reason.

The truth is that at least some of the reason why the Japanese started invading all over Asia - was to drive out the Europeans - who had invaded before. And then the Europeans -and the Americans - who saw their "interests" threatened - started screwing with the Japanese. The US had put an embargo on things like steel and oil against the Japanese, which was a real blow to the viability of their economy.

To my way of thinking the problem with all of this economic warfare stuff - is that the dumbass politicians announce it. It's one thing to come out and say to somebody "I think you suck so I'm going to cut the electric lines off your house, cut the gas lines in your car - and get your credit score ruined by telling banks you're a racist".

When you go and tell somebody "I'm going to screw you" - and then you go do it, you're setting up the stage for a war.

It's much better to just go screw them - and not tell them. They wake up one day and they have no power - and the lines are cut off their house. Their credit score is ruined - and they don't know why. You can get away with screwing somebody for a LONG time if you just don't announce it.

The Chinese and Mexicans have been doing it to us for DECADES.
How did that turn out for the japanese?
 

Broccoli Iglesias

NES Member
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
19,630
Likes
7,871
Location
Suckachusetts
Tariffs don't effect US govt debt. Though obviously it could influence further purchases. At this point China is under tough economic conditions and they have HK driving world awareness of how shitty they are. Now is the time to pressure them becuase while their economy is floundering they will need USD to help stabilize.
Chinese people have been getting their money our of China for a long time and buying properties here to keep it "safe".

The demand for dollars outside the U.S is huge.
 

Zappa

Road Warrior
NES Member
Rating - 100%
27   0   0
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
43,693
Likes
13,956
Location
Living Free In The 603
Rating - 100%
106   0   0
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
7,497
Likes
1,772
Location
Vermont
How did that turn out for the japanese?
Badly.

Things are different now though. China has nukes, and state funded hackers, and allegedly (could be Chinese bluster but who knows) missiles that cost millions designed to blow up surface ships costing billions. A hot war with China would be like [insert US vs. USSR WWIII nightmare scenarios here]
 

Spanz

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
29,488
Likes
14,634

Spanz

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
29,488
Likes
14,634
Badly.

Things are different now though. China has nukes, and state funded hackers, and allegedly (could be Chinese bluster but who knows) missiles that cost millions designed to blow up surface ships costing billions. A hot war with China would be like [insert US vs. USSR WWIII nightmare scenarios here]
We have fought the Chinese once before, near the Chosin Reservoir. How did THAT go for the US?

The approach that Nixon started, engaging the communists in China with capitalist economic forces, is STILL the best approach. It has kept this nuclear enemy on speaking terms with us for 50 years! A few setbacks do not mean we need to derail the policy! Stick with it.
 
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
20,257
Likes
8,488
Location
NH (CT Escapee)
We have fought the Chinese once before, near the Chosin Reservoir. How did THAT go for the US?

The approach that Nixon started, engaging the communists in China with capitalist economic forces, is STILL the best approach. It has kept this nuclear enemy on speaking terms with us for 50 years! A few setbacks do not mean we need to derail the policy! Stick with it.
I would argue this is not as effective as it was with the USSR. This is because of the completely insane level of censorship and control the communists have over the Chinese people. Did you see the video of the civilian cuffed to a metal restraint desk while they interrogated him over a social media post critical of police just recently? Did you know they require facial recognition to own a cell phone? That they've denied hundreds of thousands of people transportation rights over their government social score?

This is not analog 1980. The communists have ever tool Orwell dreamed about and then some. And they use them all to crush any hint of dissent.
 
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
20,257
Likes
8,488
Location
NH (CT Escapee)

calsdad

NES Member
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
37,646
Likes
12,358
Location
Chelmsford MA
We have fought the Chinese once before, near the Chosin Reservoir. How did THAT go for the US?

The approach that Nixon started, engaging the communists in China with capitalist economic forces, is STILL the best approach. It has kept this nuclear enemy on speaking terms with us for 50 years! A few setbacks do not mean we need to derail the policy! Stick with it.
I'd agree that engagement is better than war, but gutting your own country to appease an enemy is still defeat in the end, it just takes longer
 
Top Bottom