The Hillary Dumpster Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
Huma is nothing without Hitlery, remember that she has dedicated her entire adult life to service of that monster. Don't expect her to flip easily, if they do in fact have her dead to rights.
You have that backwards. Saudi Arabia has engaged in far-reaching efforts to influence American politics for decades with the ultimate goal of establishing Sharia Law in the USA.

Abedin is a Saudi mole. Hillary is very likely aware of this and doesn't care as she cares about nothing as long as she is getting hers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
10,527
Likes
6,476

Lets watch for the timing on this one.....( non election related ) or is it
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
OK, I'm putting this here so it's recorded at NES prior to the election. There's some heavy duty tinfoil out there that the election WILL be rigged and these will be the results. According to the alleged rigging algorithm, the vote numbers will change but the vote percentages will not.

To be clear, my opinion is that these numbers are MSM placeholders only but we shall see.

Line 119: US President Alabama
Line 121: > Donald Trump (R) 715,592 44%
Line 122: Hillary Clinton (D) 634,275 39%
Line 125: US President Alaska
Line 127: > Donald Trump (R) 115,252 44%
Line 128: Hillary Clinton (D) 104,973 40%
Line 133: US President Arizona
Line 135: > Donald Trump (R) 906,638 46%
Line 136: Hillary Clinton (D) 867,218 44%
Line 139: US President Arkansas
Line 141: > Hillary Clinton (D) 320,102 38%
Line 142: Donald Trump (R) 289,862 34%
Line 149: US President California
Line 151: > Hillary Clinton (D) 4,076,539 45%
Line 152: Donald Trump (R) 3,643,970 40%
Line 156: US President Colorado
Line 158: > Hillary Clinton (D) 452,857 23%
Line 159: Donald Trump (R) 367,446 19%
Line 180: US President Connecticut
Line 182: > Hillary Clinton (D) 508,013 45%
Line 183: Donald Trump (R) 451,669 40%

Line 186: US President Delaware
Line 188: > Donald Trump (R) 148,943 44%
Line 189: Hillary Clinton (D) 132,602 40%
Line 192: US President District of Columbia
Line 194: > Donald Trump (R) 111,157 45%
Line 195: Hillary Clinton (D) 99,648 40%
Line 198: US President Florida
Line 200: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,758,845 44%
Line 201: Donald Trump (R) 2,543,706 40%
Line 206: US President Georgia
Line 208: > Donald Trump (R) 1,490,410 45%
Line 209: Hillary Clinton (D) 1,324,808 40%
Line 211: US President Hawaii
Line 213: > Hillary Clinton (D) 158,720 42%
Line 214: Donald Trump (R) 152,232 41%
Line 218: US President Idaho
Line 220: > Donald Trump (R) 198,675 44%
Line 221: Hillary Clinton (D) 176,677 39%
Line 228: US President Illinois
Line 230: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,006,362 44%
Line 231: Donald Trump (R) 1,807,369 40%
Line 234: US President Indiana
Line 236: > Donald Trump (R) 1,077,142 45%
Line 237: Hillary Clinton (D) 957,461 40%
Line 239: US President Iowa
Line 241: > Donald Trump (R) 490,319 44%
Line 242: Hillary Clinton (D) 436,740 39%
Line 251: US President Kansas
Line 253: > Donald Trump (R) 392,701 44%
Line 254: Hillary Clinton (D) 349,617 40%
Line 257: US President Kentucky
Line 259: > Donald Trump (R) 721,167 44%
Line 260: Hillary Clinton (D) 647,285 40%
Line 265: US President Louisiana
Line 267: > Hillary Clinton (D) 565,941 38%
Line 268: Donald Trump (R) 536,155 36%
Line 280: US President Maine
Line 282: > Hillary Clinton (D) 223,591 43%
Line 283: Donald Trump (R) 207,990 40%

Line 286: US President Maryland
Line 288: > Hillary Clinton (D) 934,981 45%
Line 289: Donald Trump (R) 831,655 40%
Line 292: US President Massachusetts
Line 294: > Donald Trump (R) 960,930 44%
Line 295: Hillary Clinton (D) 864,838 40%

Line 298: US President Michigan
Line 300: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,495,253 40%
Line 301: Donald Trump (R) 1,420,490 38%
Line 306: US President Minnesota
Line 308: > Hillary Clinton (D) 835,772 45%
Line 309: Donald Trump (R) 643,190 34%
Line 317: US President Mississippi
Line 319: > Donald Trump (R) 455,836 44%
Line 320: Hillary Clinton (D) 404,169 39%
Line 326: US President Missouri
Line 328: > Hillary Clinton (D) 919,407 44%
Line 329: Donald Trump (R) 826,715 40%
Line 333: US President Montana
Line 335: > Donald Trump (R) 124,285 35%
Line 336: Hillary Clinton (D) 106,531 30%
Line 340: US President Nebraska
Line 342: > Donald Trump (R) 266,304 44%
Line 343: Hillary Clinton (D) 238,319 40%
Line 346: US President Nevada
Line 348: > Hillary Clinton (D) 392,071 47%
Line 349: Donald Trump (R) 349,756 42%
Line 354: US President New Hampshire
Line 356: > Donald Trump (R) 233,389 44%
Line 357: Hillary Clinton (D) 211,541 40%

Line 361: US President New Jersey
Line 363: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,225,655 43%
Line 364: Donald Trump (R) 1,104,143 39%
Line 372: US President New Mexico
Line 374: > Donald Trump (R) 257,643 41%
Line 375: Hillary Clinton (D) 243,336 39%
Line 382: US President New York
Line 384: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,874,820 49%
Line 385: Donald Trump (R) 2,464,969 42%
Line 388: US President North Carolina
Line 390: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,834,827 54%
Line 391: Donald Trump (R) 1,427,089 42%
Line 393: US President North Dakota
Line 395: > Hillary Clinton (D) 106,150 39%
Line 396: Donald Trump (R) 81,170 30%
Line 401: US President Ohio
Line 403: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,768,330 45%
Line 404: Donald Trump (R) 1,571,848 40%
Line 408: US President Oklahoma
Line 410: > Donald Trump (R) 532,869 50%
Line 411: Hillary Clinton (D) 479,581 45%
Line 413: US President Oregon
Line 415: > Donald Trump (R) 437,729 35%
Line 416: Hillary Clinton (D) 375,196 30%
Line 419: US President Pennsylvania
Line 421: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,892,527 44%
Line 422: Donald Trump (R) 1,714,575 40%
Line 426: US President Rhode Island
Line 428: > Hillary Clinton (D) 176,102 44%
Line 429: Donald Trump (R) 158,149 39%

Line 433: US President South Carolina
Line 435: > Hillary Clinton (D) 686,264 44%
Line 436: Donald Trump (R) 610,431 39%
Line 442: US President South Dakota
Line 444: > Donald Trump (R) 118,104 40%
Line 445: Hillary Clinton (D) 88,577 30%
Line 448: US President Tennessee
Line 450: > Donald Trump (R) 707,501 36%
Line 451: Hillary Clinton (D) 699,358 35%
Line 457: US President Texas
Line 459: > Hillary Clinton (D) 3,171,201 42%
Line 460: Donald Trump (R) 3,020,193 40%
Line 463: US President Utah
Line 465: > Donald Trump (R) 229,420 30%
Line 466: Hillary Clinton (D) 191,184 25%
Line 475: US President Vermont
Line 477: > Hillary Clinton (D) 102,409 44%
Line 478: Donald Trump (R) 91,938 40%

Line 483: US President Virginia
Line 485: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,207,579 44%
Line 486: Donald Trump (R) 1,087,068 40%
Line 490: US President Washington
Line 492: > Hillary Clinton (D) 830,496 39%
Line 493: Donald Trump (R) 679,285 32%
Line 499: US President West Virginia
Line 501: > Hillary Clinton (D) 276,617 44%
Line 502: Donald Trump (R) 248,391 40%
Line 506: US President Wisconsin
Line 508: > Donald Trump (R) 795,047 40%
Line 509: Hillary Clinton (D) 587,532 30%
Line 515: US President Wyoming
Line 517: > Hillary Clinton (D) 41,824 30%
Line 518: Donald Trump (R) 34,853 25%
 

babygorilla

NES Member
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
2,034
Likes
798
Location
South Shore of Massachusetts

Lets watch for the timing on this one.....( non election related ) or is it
That's some serious tinfoilery. This is a haz mat drill, or photos of an actual spill. Something that could occur anywhere or any time from transportation incidents. Haz Mat Rapid Response teams need to practice same as FD's and PD's. I used to be on one for a company I worked for so I've done a few of these.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
1,799
Likes
440
Location
Vermont
OK, I'm putting this here so it's recorded at NES prior to the election. There's some heavy duty tinfoil out there that the election WILL be rigged and these will be the results. According to the alleged rigging algorithm, the vote numbers will change but the vote percentages will not.

To be clear, my opinion is that these numbers are MSM placeholders only but we shall see.

Line 119: US President Alabama
Line 121: > Donald Trump (R) 715,592 44%
Line 122: Hillary Clinton (D) 634,275 39%
Line 125: US President Alaska
Line 127: > Donald Trump (R) 115,252 44%
Line 128: Hillary Clinton (D) 104,973 40%
Line 133: US President Arizona
Line 135: > Donald Trump (R) 906,638 46%
Line 136: Hillary Clinton (D) 867,218 44%
Line 139: US President Arkansas
Line 141: > Hillary Clinton (D) 320,102 38%
Line 142: Donald Trump (R) 289,862 34%
Line 149: US President California
Line 151: > Hillary Clinton (D) 4,076,539 45%
Line 152: Donald Trump (R) 3,643,970 40%
Line 156: US President Colorado
Line 158: > Hillary Clinton (D) 452,857 23%
Line 159: Donald Trump (R) 367,446 19%
Line 180: US President Connecticut
Line 182: > Hillary Clinton (D) 508,013 45%
Line 183: Donald Trump (R) 451,669 40%

Line 186: US President Delaware
Line 188: > Donald Trump (R) 148,943 44%
Line 189: Hillary Clinton (D) 132,602 40%
Line 192: US President District of Columbia
Line 194: > Donald Trump (R) 111,157 45%
Line 195: Hillary Clinton (D) 99,648 40%
Line 198: US President Florida
Line 200: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,758,845 44%
Line 201: Donald Trump (R) 2,543,706 40%
Line 206: US President Georgia
Line 208: > Donald Trump (R) 1,490,410 45%
Line 209: Hillary Clinton (D) 1,324,808 40%
Line 211: US President Hawaii
Line 213: > Hillary Clinton (D) 158,720 42%
Line 214: Donald Trump (R) 152,232 41%
Line 218: US President Idaho
Line 220: > Donald Trump (R) 198,675 44%
Line 221: Hillary Clinton (D) 176,677 39%
Line 228: US President Illinois
Line 230: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,006,362 44%
Line 231: Donald Trump (R) 1,807,369 40%
Line 234: US President Indiana
Line 236: > Donald Trump (R) 1,077,142 45%
Line 237: Hillary Clinton (D) 957,461 40%
Line 239: US President Iowa
Line 241: > Donald Trump (R) 490,319 44%
Line 242: Hillary Clinton (D) 436,740 39%
Line 251: US President Kansas
Line 253: > Donald Trump (R) 392,701 44%
Line 254: Hillary Clinton (D) 349,617 40%
Line 257: US President Kentucky
Line 259: > Donald Trump (R) 721,167 44%
Line 260: Hillary Clinton (D) 647,285 40%
Line 265: US President Louisiana
Line 267: > Hillary Clinton (D) 565,941 38%
Line 268: Donald Trump (R) 536,155 36%
Line 280: US President Maine
Line 282: > Hillary Clinton (D) 223,591 43%
Line 283: Donald Trump (R) 207,990 40%

Line 286: US President Maryland
Line 288: > Hillary Clinton (D) 934,981 45%
Line 289: Donald Trump (R) 831,655 40%
Line 292: US President Massachusetts
Line 294: > Donald Trump (R) 960,930 44%
Line 295: Hillary Clinton (D) 864,838 40%

Line 298: US President Michigan
Line 300: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,495,253 40%
Line 301: Donald Trump (R) 1,420,490 38%
Line 306: US President Minnesota
Line 308: > Hillary Clinton (D) 835,772 45%
Line 309: Donald Trump (R) 643,190 34%
Line 317: US President Mississippi
Line 319: > Donald Trump (R) 455,836 44%
Line 320: Hillary Clinton (D) 404,169 39%
Line 326: US President Missouri
Line 328: > Hillary Clinton (D) 919,407 44%
Line 329: Donald Trump (R) 826,715 40%
Line 333: US President Montana
Line 335: > Donald Trump (R) 124,285 35%
Line 336: Hillary Clinton (D) 106,531 30%
Line 340: US President Nebraska
Line 342: > Donald Trump (R) 266,304 44%
Line 343: Hillary Clinton (D) 238,319 40%
Line 346: US President Nevada
Line 348: > Hillary Clinton (D) 392,071 47%
Line 349: Donald Trump (R) 349,756 42%
Line 354: US President New Hampshire
Line 356: > Donald Trump (R) 233,389 44%
Line 357: Hillary Clinton (D) 211,541 40%

Line 361: US President New Jersey
Line 363: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,225,655 43%
Line 364: Donald Trump (R) 1,104,143 39%
Line 372: US President New Mexico
Line 374: > Donald Trump (R) 257,643 41%
Line 375: Hillary Clinton (D) 243,336 39%
Line 382: US President New York
Line 384: > Hillary Clinton (D) 2,874,820 49%
Line 385: Donald Trump (R) 2,464,969 42%
Line 388: US President North Carolina
Line 390: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,834,827 54%
Line 391: Donald Trump (R) 1,427,089 42%
Line 393: US President North Dakota
Line 395: > Hillary Clinton (D) 106,150 39%
Line 396: Donald Trump (R) 81,170 30%
Line 401: US President Ohio
Line 403: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,768,330 45%
Line 404: Donald Trump (R) 1,571,848 40%
Line 408: US President Oklahoma
Line 410: > Donald Trump (R) 532,869 50%
Line 411: Hillary Clinton (D) 479,581 45%
Line 413: US President Oregon
Line 415: > Donald Trump (R) 437,729 35%
Line 416: Hillary Clinton (D) 375,196 30%
Line 419: US President Pennsylvania
Line 421: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,892,527 44%
Line 422: Donald Trump (R) 1,714,575 40%
Line 426: US President Rhode Island
Line 428: > Hillary Clinton (D) 176,102 44%
Line 429: Donald Trump (R) 158,149 39%

Line 433: US President South Carolina
Line 435: > Hillary Clinton (D) 686,264 44%
Line 436: Donald Trump (R) 610,431 39%
Line 442: US President South Dakota
Line 444: > Donald Trump (R) 118,104 40%
Line 445: Hillary Clinton (D) 88,577 30%
Line 448: US President Tennessee
Line 450: > Donald Trump (R) 707,501 36%
Line 451: Hillary Clinton (D) 699,358 35%
Line 457: US President Texas
Line 459: > Hillary Clinton (D) 3,171,201 42%
Line 460: Donald Trump (R) 3,020,193 40%
Line 463: US President Utah
Line 465: > Donald Trump (R) 229,420 30%
Line 466: Hillary Clinton (D) 191,184 25%
Line 475: US President Vermont
Line 477: > Hillary Clinton (D) 102,409 44%
Line 478: Donald Trump (R) 91,938 40%

Line 483: US President Virginia
Line 485: > Hillary Clinton (D) 1,207,579 44%
Line 486: Donald Trump (R) 1,087,068 40%
Line 490: US President Washington
Line 492: > Hillary Clinton (D) 830,496 39%
Line 493: Donald Trump (R) 679,285 32%
Line 499: US President West Virginia
Line 501: > Hillary Clinton (D) 276,617 44%
Line 502: Donald Trump (R) 248,391 40%
Line 506: US President Wisconsin
Line 508: > Donald Trump (R) 795,047 40%
Line 509: Hillary Clinton (D) 587,532 30%
Line 515: US President Wyoming
Line 517: > Hillary Clinton (D) 41,824 30%
Line 518: Donald Trump (R) 34,853 25%
These percentages look ridiculous. Clinton getting SC and Texas? No way. And Hillary only getting Vermont by 4%? Also no way. Trump in MA? Come on.
 
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
5,452
Likes
1,700
OK, I'm putting this here so it's recorded at NES prior to the election. There's some heavy duty tinfoil out there that the election WILL be rigged and these will be the results. According to the alleged rigging algorithm, the vote numbers will change but the vote percentages will not.
So you're saying that the people who stand to make billions of dollars rigging the election, are going to allow themselves to get caught using an obviously flawed algorithm, when any programmer with access to a free stats package could spend 1/2 hour writing a program to generate pseudo-random tallies and percents that don't reveal obvious tampering? Is that accurate?
 
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,325
Likes
3,335
Location
Milky Way
they sure do live in an alternate reality. It's amazing how they see the world and are able to justify things that make absolutely no sense.
That's what liberals say about conservatives, too. Both sides are genetically hardwired to see the world differently, at least by this study.


Research with emotion-generating images suggest that liberals and conservatives are hardwired to see the world differently.

In a new study, researchers suggest that liberals and conservatives may disagree about politics partly because they are different people at the core—right down to their physiology and genetics.

John Alford, an associate professor of political science at Rice University and the study’s coauthor, says the research suggests that biology—not reason or the careful consideration of facts—predisposes people to see and understand the world in different ways.
“These natural tendencies to perceive the physical world in different ways may in turn be responsible for striking moments of political and ideological conflict throughout history,” Alford says.

“Conservatives are fond of saying that ‘liberals just don’t get it,’ and liberals are convinced that conservatives magnify threats—systematic evidence suggests both are correct,” says John Hibbing, lead author and professor of political science at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln.

The study found that compared to liberals, conservatives tend to register greater negative physiological responses to stimuli and devote more psychological resources to them.

For example, when study participants were shown pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS, a database of pictures used to elicit a range of emotions), eye-tracking revealed that conservative respondents fixed their gaze on negative images more rapidly (less than .8 seconds for conservatives versus nearly 1.3 seconds for liberals) and stayed focused on negative images longer (about 2.8 seconds for conservatives versus about 1.9 seconds for liberals).

http://www.futurity.org/conservatives-liberals-threat-743552/
 

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
So you're saying that the people who stand to make billions of dollars rigging the election, are going to allow themselves to get caught using an obviously flawed algorithm, when any programmer with access to a free stats package could spend 1/2 hour writing a program to generate pseudo-random tallies and percents that don't reveal obvious tampering? Is that accurate?
If you would actually read my comment instead of using your wild imagination you would see I said the opposite.

But it's too much fun to play gotcha with what you imagine I'd said, right?

I said I think those numbers are MSM placeholders, to be replaced with the actual election results later.

I put the tinfoil numbers above so we can compare them to the actual election results later.

Clear now?

- - - Updated - - -

These percentages look ridiculous. Clinton getting SC and Texas? No way. And Hillary only getting Vermont by 4%? Also no way. Trump in MA? Come on.
Ditto.
 

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
That's what liberals say about conservatives, too. Both sides are genetically hardwired to see the world differently, at least by this study.
This is something I've believed for a long time. Our brains are not identical, in fact there are wide variations in perception and we're all operating on different mental maps.

It's very likely some people actually do have superior brain wiring for observing objective reality fwiw.
 
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
5,452
Likes
1,700
If you would actually read my comment instead of using your wild imagination you would see I said the opposite.

But it's too much fun to play gotcha with what you imagine I'd said, right?

I said I think those numbers are MSM placeholders, to be replaced with the actual election results later.

I put the tinfoil numbers above so we can compare them to the actual election results later.

Clear now?

- - - Updated - - -



Ditto.
You can't claim that you have the rigged election results a week prior, then accuse other people of having a wild imagination. Those results are just something someone made up for fun, to see if people would spread it around.
 

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
You can't claim that you have the rigged election results a week prior, then accuse other people of having a wild imagination. Those results are just something someone made up for fun, to see if people would spread it around.
I'm not claiming anything. You're using your wild imagination to claim I said stuff I didn't.

Those numbers come from a spreadsheet used by a company that supplies data to TV stations so they are all reading from the same script. Take a look for yourself.

The tinfoilers believe that because those numbers exist today they are evidence of intent to rig.

I believe they are placeholders for the actual numbers which will be plugged in later.

We will see who is right next week.
 

new guy

NES Member
Rating - 100%
57   0   0
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
22,040
Likes
17,335
OK, I'm putting this here so it's recorded at NES prior to the election. There's some heavy duty tinfoil out there that the election WILL be rigged and these will be the results. According to the alleged rigging algorithm, the vote numbers will change but the vote percentages will not.
If they're just placeholders then I could expect the turnout numbers to have been pulled out of thin air, not tracking realistic expectations for each state. Alternatively, I'd expect them to just be grabbed from some prior election's actual results. Anything short of those two scenarios is suspect.
 

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
If they're just placeholders then I could expect the turnout numbers to have been pulled out of thin air, not tracking realistic expectations for each state. Alternatively, I'd expect them to just be grabbed from some prior election's actual results. Anything short of those two scenarios is suspect.
You're leaning to the tinfoil side there. I would not expect the riggers to be so stupid they would reveal their method and their intent a week ahead of time, even on a hidden web page.

But should they in fact be that stupid the numbers I put up would prove it a week from now.
 

new guy

NES Member
Rating - 100%
57   0   0
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
22,040
Likes
17,335
You're leaning to the tinfoil side there. I would not expect the riggers to be so stupid they would reveal their method and their intent a week ahead of time, even on a hidden web page.

But should they in fact be that stupid the numbers I put up would prove it a week from now.
My point is that you should be able to tell how much effort someone put into getting believable numbers in there. If they're placeholders then they wouldn't need to be believable, they'd just have to show that data was feeding and being handled correctly (% calculations, etc.). I wouldn't expect someone to research enrollment numbers for that purpose.
 

mibro

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
12,238
Likes
9,064
Location
Mass.
My point is that you should be able to tell how much effort someone put into getting believable numbers in there. If they're placeholders then they wouldn't need to be believable, they'd just have to show that data was feeding and being handled correctly (% calculations, etc.). I wouldn't expect someone to research enrollment numbers for that purpose.
Yup, I did understand your point. It's a fair amount of trouble to go to to generate believable numbers that will just be overwritten later.

Which is why I put the numbers up in the first place. In the unlikely event the tinfoilers are right, I will be wildly entertained.

 

je25ff

NES Member
Rating - 100%
10   0   0
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
12,050
Likes
3,175
Wasn't sure which thread to put this in but, since the perps are commies, I figured it goes in the Hillary thread

 
Last edited by a moderator:

whalerman69

NES Member
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,356
Likes
801
You could argue that they did the same thing with veterans after WW2. 16 million people were American vets of WW2. Right after, they could go to college for free and get things like VA loans.

Food for thought.
Ya same thing, tell that to my 91 year old combat vet father. He took out a loan, worked while going to school and raised a family. Same thing.... WOW
 
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
3,406
Likes
819
Location
Help I'm steppin' into the twilight zone
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Then I heard another voice from heaven saying,“Come out of her, my people,
lest you take part in her sins,
lest you share in her plagues;
[SUP]5 [/SUP]for her sins are heaped high as heaven,
and God has remembered her iniquities.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]Pay her back as she herself has paid back others,
and repay her double for her deeds;
mix a double portion for her in the cup she mixed.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]As she glorified herself and lived in luxury,
so give her a like measure of torment and mourning,
since in her heart she says,
‘I sit as a queen,
I am no widow,
and mourning I shall never see.’
[SUP]8 [/SUP]For this reason her plagues will come in a single day,
death and mourning and famine,
and she will be burned up with fire;
for mighty is the Lord God who has judged her.”

[SUP]9 [/SUP]And the kings of the earth, who committed sexual immorality and lived in luxury with her, will weep and wail over her when they see the smoke of her burning. [SUP]10 [/SUP]They will stand far off, in fear of her torment...

Revelation 18:4-10

I hope and pray that a good portion of that will apply to Hillary Rodham Clinton very soon.
 
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
3,563
Likes
2,266
Location
nh
That's what liberals say about conservatives, too. Both sides are genetically hardwired to see the world differently, at least by this study...
I have this ex buddy who fell off the democratic deep end and one of his favorite tactics is to lie about and misunderstand certain facts until I start to lose my patience so he can claim I am the angry one who therefore must obviously be wrong...
 
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
3,406
Likes
819
Location
Help I'm steppin' into the twilight zone
I have this ex buddy who fell off the democratic deep end and one of his favorite tactics is to lie about and misunderstand certain facts until I start to lose my patience so he can claim I am the angry one who therefore must obviously be wrong...
Just shoot him and say, "Yeah, I am angry but you are dead, I win."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom