drgrant:
The issue with rapid fire is, as you said, keeping them all in the target. The problem is, what if people aren't keeping them all in the target, as happened in my club? The baffles on the ceiling started to get shot up. Quite often there is no one on the range but the shooter. So how do you police it?
Well, that's a good question. Regardless, I don't really think limiting
magazine capacity is going to stop idiots from being idiots. You could
have a guy with a 2 shot .38 derringer. or a small 5 shot snub that doesnt
know what hes doing putting a bunch of pockmarks in those
baffles, just as much as you could have a moron dump 17 rounds of 9mm
into the baffles with a G17. The G17 might cause more damage
but at the end of the day, the shooters are still morons, and they're
still both damaging club property.
I'm guessing the reasoning is less rounds on tap means less
chances the guy is going to do a wild mag dump... maybe... but who
knows. Chances are the random bullet sprayers will ignore that rule
anyways. The idea is sort of a crapshoot in that regard.
So that leads us to the following... how to get members to clean up
their act? Maybe a basic range safety qualification for
some? Maybe a "fee" that gets tacked onto membership renewals to
pay for damages, that way more people will be encouraged to stop the
knuckleheads, and the like. Maybe a mandatory meeting for all
range users, being overly obnoxious about the fact that if "a bullet
leaves the range, the club may die" and all of a sudden nobody will
have anywhere to shoot anymore. (then mention the other clubs,
like what you did earlier, to show that, yes, its not just paranoia, and
range closures or suspensions CAN happen. )
Of course I realize all of this is a pipe dream- getting members to concsiously
do a few things is probably like herding cats. I recognize
that and feel your pain. Getting people to put bullets into the backstop
seems simple, but given a few knuckleheads in the mix it probably -feels-
like an exercise in futility. Then you have to come up with anti-moron
devices like some ranges use... eg, baffles on overhangs, etc, so that
if someone shoots high, the bullet gets stuck in the overhang, etc... all
of which, are of course costly... and it's like wrapping a car in bubble
wrap to protect it from door dings... its not very practical. And even
given some of those devices, some -still- do insanely stupid things.
In the situation that you described, suppose there were several holes already on the target. Now how would the range officer have known whether all rounds hit the target or not? He wouldn't have, would he?
Well, in that specific situation, the RO was wandering around behind the
firing line collecting brass or something, so he was there the whole
time. The rule was not posted anywhere in the range proper, so
my friend didn't know what it was until the RO whined about
it.
I don't like the no-rapid-fire rule myself. But given the limitations of our range, it was the best thing we could come up with.
Is there an inadequate backstop or some other technical reason why
rapid fire doesn't "work" there? If the bullet traps are poor or are
dimensionally challenged, then yeah, I can see how there might be problems
and lots of restrictions may have to be put in place. If it's a human
problem, again, introducing an arbitrary restriction isn't going to really "fix" it.
All that restriction ends up doing is penalizing the people who actually conciously
obey the rules and try to put bullets into the backstop
and not the ceiling. Course I do understand the old adage- i t only
takes one person to screw it up for everyone else.
One thing that not allowing rapid fire does, is it scares certain types of
shooters away. (Of course depending on the demographic of your
club, and the type of shooters that go there, it might not really
matter. EG, if the club lives mostly off shotgunners, having funny
rules on the pistol range isn't going to hurt the clubs ability to pull in
dues. On the other hand, certain rules banning capacity, rapid fire,
and (belt level) holster use, basically exclude a large class of rifle and
pistol shooters. I, for one, won't sign on anywhere I can't do controlled rapid
firing or drawing from a holster, at a minimum. I don't mind a safety
briefing (even if it was an annual requirement) or even getting
"checked out" on the ranges.
I really do wish that all of you folks who are so quick to criticize would join the leadership of your clubs. Come help as we spend hours and hours of our time wrestling with these issues. Since all of you so clearly know better than we do
, come join the leadership and show us the ONE TRUE WAY...
I understand that different clubs have different sets of issues, and not
all of them are easily solved. I don't think limiting capacity is a very
good stopgap, though. It might slow down the rate of bonehead
damage, but it's not going to stop it. Only vigilance by the members
and officers of the club can do that. Self policing is good, a lot of
crap could be stopped by someone simply -saying something- when it needs
to be said. I don't know if there is "one true way". I understand
that what works for one club might not work for another, etc.
-Mike