Here's the really ridiculous part:
This thread is discussing the legality of having a adjustable or telescoping stock "pinned" in place to make it Mass AWB compliant. A very valid question, to be sure. However, here's the part that makes my brain itch:
It is a well known fact that one of the main reasons the AWB was put into place at the Federal level, was that these "Assault weapons" had "evil features" that made them very closely resemble their military counterparts (how this was or is an actual safety or crime issue, I have yet to determine
)
Here's the kicker that proves (once again) that the Commie-crats that run this joint have utterly NO idea how ineffective the gun "laws" here are:
Whether a collapsible stock is pinned, or can move freely...
IT STILL LOOKS LIKE A COLLAPSIBLE STOCK!
Yet if it's pinned it's legal, which is entirely contradictory to the whole "purpose"
of the ban in the first place.
"But Mr./Mrs. Lawmaker, I thought we were trying to get rid of these evil LOOKING features."
The actual functionality of the stock is not brought into play for it's horrible, baby-slaughtering ability to make the gun more comfortable to fire, but because it looks "evil".
Yet more "feel good" law bullshit from the place where liberty was born (And by that, I mean earned with blood and firearms)
Sorry for the temporary derailment of the thread, but I thought this was a valid point, and I can no longer keep it bottled up...
As far as the concept of what's pinned "enough", I've seen guns in shops here in Mass that had M4 style stocks on them that were immobilized from the factory. Speaking strictly from my own interpretations, here's my take:
IANAL (There I said it)
1. In order to have any legal issue, with the stock (or the rest of the gun for that matter) you'd have to have an encounter with some type of LEO, which given the many discussions we've all had on this board, is rare at best. This is particularly true with an AR style gun, as most likely it wouldn't leave your house except for a range event of some type. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm in no way saying "Don't worry about the ban, do what you want" but hear me out...
2. If (and it's a big if) you were to come under legal scrutiny, the LEO in question would have to know the particulars of the AWB, AND know (think he knows) that your serial number on your gun was post ban (Oh the legal wringer he'd be wrung through if your gun was legit pre-ban, or post ban AWB compliant and he hauled you in anyways)
3. Let's say #1 AND #2 both happen for one reason or another, after you demonstrate to the LEO that your gun is in fact, AWB compliant (In this particular case, the stock is "fixed") and has no other "evil features" aside from the pistol grip that all AR's have, do you really think that any LEO is going to bother with you? Are they going to check how the stock was pinned? God, I hope not.
I know, I know. We all spend alot of time on this board discussing how utterly moronic the laws are here, and that there's a vulture of a prosecutor just waiting to hit us law-abiding folks with every statute in the book if we so much as go outside our home and say "gun", but at some point enough has got to be enough.
Thanks for letting me rant, and honestly, hold out for a pre-ban gun. I did, and there's something nice about knowing full well that your particular gun is yours to do what you want with (for now
). I saw a Colt Sporter HBAR at the NH show a couple of weeks ago for 950.00, and you can bolt the kitchen sink onto it if you want. Check NH dealers, then reference the serial number of the gun against
www.ar15.com to determine if it's pre-ban. The states that don't have this ridiculous AWB usually have good deals on older guns, as people often trade up to newer guns without worry of becoming "non-compliant".
Just my 2 cents.