• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

T&G poll

If anything, this stresses yet again that these campuses are target rich environments.
 
The Worcester Telegram & Gazette is a shell of what it was (that's not saying much) in the days where there were actually reporters and it was difficult finding spelling, grammar and just incomplete stories. Completely irrelevant!
Having said that....................I voted.
Still 63% No, 37% Yes.
 
How about more kook control and leave the rest of us alone?

Tell you why that won't happen. It costs nothing to pass legislation to ban something. It costs buckets of cash to address the root cause.
 
You've heard it a million times. Guns don't kill people, people do. They can make all the laws they want but the killers will still find a way to get a gun. I vote no
 
It's a shame that mass shootings, committed by mentally challenged people, always result in targeting the rights of good, law abiding gun owners, rather than the problems of the mentally challenged that commit these crimes. Hillary says it's the NRA's fault. Then again, Hillary also said that it's a "good idea" to lie. Part of the truth is that Hillary, her agenda and her thought process are contributors to the rise of gun ownership in America. Who can say how many of these mentally challenged people that have and will commit these crimes against humanity have been inspired to acquire firearms by Hillary, her threats to take away firearms and people like her. If we the people can ever find a way to legally and effectively control Hillary and people like her, it's possible that we will have taken the first real step in decreasing these crimes as well.
 
Last edited:
CobaltBlueSteel said:
Looks like they changed the poll to...



Yes? No? Maybe? It's a seriously subjectively dumb question.
Click to expand...

Not dumb at all.
It's like the "Have you stopped beating your wife ?" question.
No matter how it turns out, it can be spun.
A yes answer is spun to say that's because of our strict gun laws.
A no answer means we need more gun control.
 
Dadstoys said:
Not dumb at all.
It's like the "Have you stopped beating your wife ?" question.
No matter how it turns out, it can be spun.
A yes answer is spun to say that's because of our strict gun laws.
A no answer means we need more gun control.
Click to expand...
Exactly. It has to be spun to make sense and every person can spin it differently. That's why I said it was subjectively dumb.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll
Poll: MCarbo or Galloway Precision to upgrade a Ruger LCP?
Replies
2
Views
293
Qwikdraw45
Qwikdraw45
  • Poll
POLL - EDC Light Method
2 3
Replies
76
Views
2K
greencobra
greencobra
CCDL Testimony Highlights: Holly Sullivan, 3/13/24 Carry in Polling Places
Replies
4
Views
166
sbhaven
S
Poll: Gun ownership reaches record high with American electorate
Replies
19
Views
632
MaverickNH
MaverickNH
Go and vote on their stupid poll
Replies
15
Views
835
Rat187
Rat187
Back
Top Bottom