Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches

I didn't expect to see these three being against the new ruling


Based on their history and previous findings. These three are the 'liberal' core of the supreme court if you want to categorize them. I understand that all the justices are required to rule based on the Constitution but as we have seen in the past, politics have come into play.

Ginsburg who has spoken out about the US Constitution, sides with it on this case and is in dissent with the vote.
Kagen also has shown support for those who think our Constitution is flawed - also sides with the Constitution on this case and is in dissent with the vote.
Sotomayor is just a socialist. She is not objective and her actions are for the "greater good". She was with the Constitution on this case.

I am not turning this into a debate about the judges, I was just stating that I did not expect these three justices to be on the side of the Constitution in this case.

I was shocked too when saw the names.
 
Believe it or not, many liberals support the 4th far more than most conservatives. That is exactly why I'm not surprised. Neither side supports the whole constitution.
 
So to all you Republicans. Now you see why I keep saying that Republican or DemocRAT, its the same 5h1t, just a different flavor.
These "law and order" republicans just took away what little was left of the 4th Amendment.

The only R worth his weight in bovine feces is Rand Paul, who is a libertarian dressed up as a Republican.

- - - Updated - - -

Believe it or not, many liberals support the 4th far more than most conservatives. That is exactly why I'm not surprised. Neither side supports the whole constitution.

Thats not hard to believe at all. Liberals are stronger supporters of the 1a, 4a, and 5a. Conservatives tend to support the 2a and give lip service to the 10a, although neither really have any respect for the 10th.

Libertarians tend to support all of the above.
 
Back
Top Bottom