Supreme Court - NYSRPA v. Bruen - Megathread

So I wonder how the supreme court decision will affect the 'may issue, but really will never issue unless you've got friends on the force' towns in MA like Brookline?
If I were on the select board Brookline, I'd be getting estimates for legal fees to defend a federal case; the possibility of a 1983 claim forcing it to pay the plaintiffs legal fees, and an attorney's expert opinion on how likely they would win on a restrictions case. This is a financial decision for Brookline that those responsible for spending taxpayer money should weigh in on.
 
Just asked about FID above for the second time. Wondering if anything changes with that. I'm guessing no, since this case was about handguns and does not mention age.



Now I'm curious. What law is this?



Then why would someone post it if it is not correct? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: [mg] [mg] [mg]

It showed the transformation of the various circuit courts of appeals from 2017 to 2020.
 
I don't think you want to have SCOTUS becoming an investigative body. I don't think we will ever know what happened in 2020 when it comes to elections because of COVID. We have to accept that and move on. Now in 2022 and 2024 we need to keep the left on a short leash and monitor their activities. You can't cheat when you're being watched 24/7. That's what we need to do.
True. But the problem is that Mass just passed the Votes Act which legalizes election cheating. That's a big problem.
 
Funny how she was a republican and then a democrat, and now that the democrats abandoned her in 2020 is now coming back to the republicans. Lots of things I like about Tulsi but a lot I don’t like too (she’s for open borders and is a socialist).

A lot of politicians in both parties don't really care much about guns, idealogically. They'll say whatever they think will get them elected, knowing that they'll never be expected to actually do anything if they ever get to Washington.

Gabbard is a Hawaiian MP officer, meaning there's a strong possibility she's a statist. She also ran as a Democrat, meaning she had to be pro-gun control.

But what does she really believe? Does she actually care all that much about guns?

I think this SCOTUS ruling will provide cover for a lot of those centrists on both sides, who can now throw up their hands and say, "Hey, it's the Supreme Court! It's not my call! I think 'gun violence' is terrible, but the Court has spoken!"

Who knows?
 
How different from:

- Crafting a novel coronavirus and setting it loose causing a pandemic?
- Demanding medical professionals ignore demonstrably effective prophylaxes and treatments (e.g. vitamin D) and demonizing others (e.g. Ivermectin) to drive the body count - and thus fear factor - up?
- Moving infected patients in with vulnerable populations to do so even more?
- Coercing most of the population into taking demonstrably ineffective and unsafe "vaccines" against same.
As few as one person can do each of those things.
You think it took 100,000 ChiComs to drop a test tube on the ground?

"Hundreds of district races?" Pffft.

As I keep pointing out, even New Hampshire STILL hasn't done anything of consequence about election integrity.
If you can't find enough places to bury all the vote thieves in Grafton County
on your own property, I don't know what to tell you.

This blog post from our most prominent 2A attorney and advocate is specific to what is happening in Pennsylvania but has broad application. I understand people are skeptical but the folks arguing these cases at FPC are incredibly optimistic. This guy has a long record of big wins for PA.

Guy thinks he's gonna overturn PP status for youts with misdafelonies.
[popcorn]

Notwithstanding the ink the parties spill over this provision, the Statute of Northampton—at least as it was understood during the Middle Ages—has little bearing on the Second Amendment adopted in 1791.
Any chance that could be because we revolted against the government which enacted the Statute of Northampton?
8fc69e_3fb85aad44c442ffa2671111978a9f83~mv2.jpg

That needs an armed revolution and if it fails they will be hanging from trees.
Hence my recommendation for the resuscitation of Arbor Day ceremonies.

... that is a wildlife conservation law. While it only applies to hunters, as an anti poacher measure.
It's an infringement.

How high can the regulatory bar be raised for a carry permit? The Supreme Court might need to clarify if states like New York respond to Bruen by demanding a $5,000 fee and 1,000 hours of training.
The WSJ might need to read the ruling.
Pretend-reporters.
Clowns.

This SCOTUS isn’t the meek and disappointing SCOTUS with Kennedy and Ginsburg. SCOTUS has a true 6-3 conservative majority
Ehzcn4GX0AEGZpR.jpg

Very Fake Quote.

There was no election rigging.
I just unzoomed your avatar to see the whole pixel array.
81dtpRZadIL._AC_SY550_.jpg
 
Perhaps, but they could still put lots of stupid requirements to apply. I want a NY, IL,NJ and MA permit just as a FU. They could require multiple in-person visits as an example. ie: application, interview and pick-up
I agree with you, the states in question could add more BS requirements, just like they did in Washington D.C. It's hard for me to believe that these people who have been suppressing our 2nd Amendment rights for so long would just surrender all their power because of one court ruling. So tell me, who will enforce this new shall-issue law? The very people who want to restrict our rights? No one in authority in Massachusetts is going to make it easy for anyone to get a LTC. I have had a LTC for over 45 years and they still make it difficult for me. Despite what many people may think, that is just not going to happen in the near future. But if it ever does happen, it won't happen until many battles are fought on the state and local levels.
 
The mob intimidation antics very well may have pushed Kavanaugh and Roberts to stop being squishes. I think they may have figured out that appearing to be influenced by the press and mobs was inviting harassment where if they put their foot down it is more likely the harassment stops.
With the DOJ openly opposing SCOTUS, you all better curb your enthusiasm on what is really going to change.
This is exactly what they want, and why so far, that they have been winning. Time to celebrate your enthusiasm, and share it with everyone you know.


Good to know say no to a leg stand yes to the blow box.
"That's what she said."
 
As few as one person can do each of those things.
You think it took 100,000 ChiComs to drop a test tube on the ground?


If you can't find enough places to bury all the vote thieves in Grafton County
on your own property, I don't know what to tell you.


Guy thinks he's gonna overturn PP status for youts with misdafelonies.
[popcorn]


Any chance that could be because we revolted against the government which enacted the Statute of Northampton?
8fc69e_3fb85aad44c442ffa2671111978a9f83~mv2.jpg


Hence my recommendation for the resuscitation of Arbor Day ceremonies.


It's an infringement.


The WSJ might need to read the ruling.
Pretend-reporters.
Clowns.


Ehzcn4GX0AEGZpR.jpg


Very Fake Quote.


I just unzoomed your avatar to see the whole pixel array.
81dtpRZadIL._AC_SY550_.jpg
I’m at happy hour so I can’t go into a lot of detail but he’s won some big cases here. Time will tell.
 
As few as one person can do each of those things.
You think it took 100,000 ChiComs to drop a test tube on the ground?
The intent was to create a bug JUST BAD ENOUGH... but not too bad. They didn't want themselves or their employers bad off, of course. So yes, that took the coordinated efforts of a lab with... someone like a certain US public health official. Not just a dropped tube.

If you can't find enough places to bury all the vote thieves in Grafton County
on your own property, I don't know what to tell you.

You DO know that Hanover ( = Dartmouth) and Lebanon are in Grafton Co., right? Hella burial ground I'd need.
 
You aren't going to have much of a revolution 150 characters at a time on Twitter. At some point it requires someone to engage in violence. That's the only thing I worry about is the left going bonkers and violent.
Sure they can. In fact, they are doing that right now. They are winning mindshare all the time. Hopefully, this will slow it down a bit.


If I were on the select board Brookline, I'd be getting estimates for legal fees to defend a federal case; the possibility of a 1983 claim forcing it to pay the plaintiffs legal fees, and an attorney's expert opinion on how likely they would win on a restrictions case. This is a financial decision for Brookline that those responsible for spending taxpayer money should weigh in on.
Great point. Make it meaningful in ba$ic term$.
 
I suspect NY will make some minor changes as it was their licensing scheme specifically address. Other states will do nothing or make meaningless changes that will require additional challenges and lower courts will make a tenuous argument explaining how they actually are complying with the case and people will continue to have their 2A rights violated. And there will be little redress.

It’s a cynical outlook but I’ve become far too jaded after reading about thousands of examples and cases in which people have clearly had their rights violated (1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A), often obviously maliciously too, and it’s the courts as much than anyone who are doing the violating.
 
Justice Clarence Thomas has always been my favorite of the 9. He and Thomas Sowell are men of a time much passed but with timeless wisdom.

I’ve only read up to page 80 so far and I am very, very impressed by how badass this opinion was written. It was like a 9CCA Justice Roger Benítez decision but on steroids.

The way they made sure to keep referring to the Heller and McDonald opinions leaves zero room for doubt on what “keep and bear arms” means.

On that note, the hyenas on the Left hate losing more than they hate us. I wouldn’t be surprised if they try to pack the SCOTUS or for states like MA to pass some retrobutionary bullshit gun control. Eternal vigilance really is key.
 
Haven't seen this discussed yet, but what does this ruling mean in the future for reciprocity? Since now all states are on the same playing field in terms of shall issue (minus stuff like range qualifications or vision/mental health checks) what's the reason that someone who has a CCW license in Montana can't carry in NYC?
 
I just left a message for the Medford LO informing him that I'd like to discuss my restricted LTC in the wake of the SCOTUS ruling, I expect a call back either tomorrow or Monday.
Odds are Medford will tell you they aren't doing anything until an opinion is obtained by Medford's legal counsel.

I fully expect Maura to issue a bullshit advisory letter after conferring with the Cabal, Sugar Daddy Bloomberg, and maybe even the DoJ in D.C.
 
And the Professors who "educated" him on the evilness of America. Don't these elitist Professors realize they will be the first to disappear if the left wins a Civil War and we become a Communist/Socialist country? Who did Stalin, Mao, Fidel, Ho, etc. go after first when they took power by violent revolution?


Morons!

It just occurred to me that this is going to take a big bite out the retirement plans for all those license guys who have been banking all that sweet bribe money.
 
You do realize that Faker Baker took Bloomberg money on his last campaign right? He's no more a fan of gun rights than horsey face Maura.
I'm well aware that he is NO GOOD! I don't doubt for a second that he will lower himself to get money when needed, just like the other no good RINO, Mittens Romney! They both suck!
 
I remember when I got my NY pistol permit in the early '90s.

The judge that issued it was a former Marine.

He had a Monte Carlo SS that he would drag race on the weekends.

My buddy's dad (both Marines) owned a service station and he worked on the judge's car.

Since I was in the Marines at the time, he signed off on the permit without having me fulfil the safety class requirement.

(My formal pistol training at the time consisted of familiarization firing the 1911 in boot camp and qualifying (sharpshooter) with it at the School of Infantry.)

The judge only issued "carry" permits and did not issue "target/practice" permits saying, "What sense does that make?"

The permit wasn't good in the five boroughs, but I didn't go there anyway.

Non resident permits or reciprocity would ne nice, but I don't think that's realistic in the near future.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom