Supreme Court - NYSRPA v. Bruen - Megathread

Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
13,326
Likes
6,632
Ruling or not, you will never see a shall-issue law in Massachusetts. And if it ever does happen, Massachusetts will be the very last state to do it.

It just became shall issue, that was decided today.

Also, as bad as Massachusetts is on carry licenses, NY, NJ, the populated counties of CA, all Hawaii, etc are MUCH worse.

NJ has about 40k conceal carry licenses and those are all politically connected people, former cops, etc. Massachusetts has 500k and it’s a smaller state. Hawaii hasn’t issued a single one in over a decade. Etc.
 

pdm

NES Member
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
10,518
Likes
2,400
Location
Taxachusetts
1656001185629_jpeg-2428048.JPG


1656000386109_png-2428053.JPG
Hoes mad.
 

Roadglide

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,471
Likes
4,177
Ok. Lets not compare the RMV and their 700 different BS processes with a single process to get an LTC.
Ok I’ll end it with this. This is not unique to the Rmv. Let’s talk about the DPS or FMCSA. Their online systems are just as f***ed. My point is you putting trust into them getting it right is surprising to say the least.
 

Mesatchornug

Instructor
NES Member
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
7,412
Likes
13,091
Location
People's Republik
Without reading the decision, besides shall issue being on the table, does this effect Herr Healy's personal opinions on what the AWB means and or mag limits in the state?
It couldn't. It wouldn't.

The question in this case was whether the NYC licensing scheme was constitutional.
Maybe mag limits. But it only refers to handguns and self defense.
Not until a future decision is made. Some of which are in the wings.

This case was only about a may-issue scheme for a license to carry a firearm outside the home (and whether it's appropriate to apply means-end tests in making these decisions). Any other questions are covered in other cases.
 

GaryO

NES Member
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
17,679
Likes
13,044
Location
Franklin
Does anyone really think that NY will follow the Supreme Court ? The governor and mayor D-bag said that they don't agree with it and will follow the lead of the WH when it comes to stay in Mexico. Sure it was ruled on but it's a toothless tiger at this point.
 

Sparky123

NES Member
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
1,937
Likes
2,144
Location
Not from around here.
It just became shall issue, that was decided today.

Also, as bad as Massachusetts is on carry licenses, NY, NJ, the populated counties of CA, all Hawaii, etc are MUCH worse.

NJ has about 40k conceal carry licenses and those are all politically connected people, former cops, etc. Massachusetts has 500k and it’s a smaller state. Hawaii hasn’t issued a single one in over a decade. Etc.
If there is any way around this, Massachusetts will find it.
 
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
13,326
Likes
6,632
Without reading the decision, besides shall issue being on the table, does this effect Herr Healy's personal opinions on what the AWB means and or mag limits in the state?

Not directly right now. All the decisions from the past 12 years will be relitigated based on this ruling.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Messages
1,320
Likes
2,261
Does this mean NYC people can finally get shall issue pistol permits? don't need to lick the sphincter of their local politicians and police captains
 

Broccoli Iglesias

NES Member
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
42,244
Likes
72,008
Does anyone really think that NY will follow the Supreme Court ? The governor and mayor D-bag said that they don't agree with it and will follow the lead of the WH when it comes to stay in Mexico. Sure it was ruled on but it's a toothless tiger at this point.
LOL ... it doesn't matter what the Gov or Mayor agree with, they can cry all they want.

They won't follow it until someone with some money takes them to court and f*cks them, and there are plenty of people with money there.
 

Rob Boudrie

NES Member
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
42,992
Likes
24,675
A first step should be not just "shall issue" but "shall issue without restrictions". Two potential cases come to mind:

1) a person denied for a non-disabling record (expired RO; not guilty finding; dismissed charges; etc.)
2) a person denied unrestricted outright, or issued a restricted LTC. Brookline, meet Comm2A [rofl]
 
Top Bottom