If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS March Giveaway ***Taurus G3c***
where are the larger companies joining the boycotts? With the exception of Barrett how many of these large companies have made any attempt to boycott these Totalitarian states? Everything they have done is about the all mighty dollar, they dont give 2 ***** whether or not our 2A rights are intact.
Magpul is decent sized. 600 employees, 100million in sales.
they are moving arent they? And even they havent fully boycotted the states like NY. LEO can still get stuff from them
I'm glad they are standing up and making themselves be heard with their $ that the state won't see. However, I'm willing to bet that many of the CT crazies are only too happy to see them go. They're probably thrilled to lose all that nasty blood money.
I don't think it matters if it's 'easier' for a big or small company to pick up and move, because it's not easy for either. Hopefully some states will subsidize some aspects to ease the financial part, but that's not all of it. It's easy for us to sit here and lambast a company for not leaving, but there's more to it than many of us can understand. It's not just the cost of the move, it's disruptions in production leading to more lost revenue, getting a new facility, obtaining permits/licenses, getting up and leaving your life behind, possibly leaving your family, and asking your employees, who may be long-time friends, to do the same. I'm sure there's a lot more to it than even that.
I'm not a fan of Remington taking money and staying, but they took fed $ just now (and a contract, not a handout), not NY $. They did take $5.6 million from NY state a few years ago, but that was before this recent crap, so I'm not sure how I judge them just yet. If I'm wrong about the details, someone please correct me.
I applaud any company that even seriously considers leaving, and I have a ton of respect for any company that actually pulls it off. They will definitely earn my business in the future.
Oh yeah? try it sometime.
These are manufacturing jobs, it hurts the supply chain, for every 1 direct job lost, there are 3-4 indirect jobs affected.
You have it backwards. Stag is leaving and PTR is considering.
They also don't have the pull or get the offers the large companies do. It's not all about pure integrity. I'm sure the logistics of moving Remington are just a bit more involved than moving the 40 person Stag operation.
While I still applaud the small companies sending a message, I'm not quite as quick to attribute to a higher moral standard since its generally a lot easier for a small company to relocate than a large one.
Born in NB, raised in NB, nearly all of his workers are from NB (Polish), this isn't a person that's willing to throw out his life over some dollar bills and to imply otherwise is an insult to his character.
WORKER ADJUSTMENT AND RETRAINING NOTIFICATION (WARN) ACT
The WARN Act is a federal law requiring employers of 100 or more full-time workers to give 60-days advance notice of a plant closing or mass layoff. This federal law applies to employers in the State of Connecticut.
Employers with 100 or more full-time workers are affected if they:
The law requires that this notification be given to the appropriate local chief elected official, the Dislocated Worker Unit of the State Department of Labor, and the collective bargaining representative of affected employees or each employee if the employees do not have such representation.
- close a facility or discontinue an operating unit with 50 or more workers; or
- lay off 50-499 workers (and these workers comprise at least 33% of the total workforce at a single site of employment); or
- lay off 500 or more workers at a single site of employment.
Written notification should be printed on company letterhead, signed by the authorized employer representative, and addressed to:
Rapid Response Unit
Connecticut Department of Labor
200 Folly Brook Boulevard
Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114
This notification should include: the name and address of the employment site where the plant closing or mass lay off will occur; the date(s) of proposed closing or mass layoff; the number of affected workers, and address of their collective bargaining representative and chief elected officer if applicable; and, the name, address, and telephone number of the employer representative to contact regarding the closing or mass layoff.
the smaller companies seem to have more integrity then the larger ones with the exception of hopefully Beretta
Larger companies also tend to have much deeper pockets to facilitate such a move and are also prone to receiving better relocation perks from other local and state governments who really want them.It's also much easier for a small company to move. Large companies have significantly more equipment that has to be relocated or replaced. They also have larger skilled work forces that have to relocate or be replaced. I can't begin to guess how long it would take a company like Smith & Wesson to move their entire operation out of MA and get it up and running in another state. The cost would have to include lost sales because their production equipment was off line for a substantial amount of time.
It's also much easier for a small company to move. Large companies have significantly more equipment that has to be relocated or replaced. They also have larger skilled work forces that have to relocate or be replaced. I can't begin to guess how long it would take a company like Smith & Wesson to move their entire operation out of MA and get it up and running in another state. The cost would have to include lost sales because their production equipment was off line for a substantial amount of time.
I applaud them but "plan" to leave and actually leave are 2 different things....
I heard that Stag was staying put now because Ct. had given them / was going to give them tax incentives not to leave.
They need to plan to leave before they can actually leave.
I shit you not, this is not a John Madden "what they need to do is score more points than the other team" adage. Here's the CT page on the law. The best part is that you need to notify the Rapid Response Unit at least 60 days before the layoff/closing. This shit is straight out Atlas Shrugged.
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act
I heard that Stag was staying put now because Ct. had given them / was going to give them tax incentives not to leave.
i think malloy nullified this when he said to the gun makers, "get the f out of CT"Rapid response unit. More like the "WTF we gonna do now" unit.
The company makes military-style rifles
I read something Stag released saying they were looking into a change in the pistol grip to comply with the new rules.
Yankee Ingenuity Meets A Ban: Effort To Redesign AR-15 Underway | Dan Haar