What's good for us is good for all...
Late night decisions behind closed doors, deadlines for turning in banned mags, destruction of firearms with no passing down or inheritance of firearms....
How do they actually believe this protects from ANY criminal
i have seen that. But, the analogy is a little off. He is the president of the USA. I can appreciate the point, but nobody here is even close to being at as much risk as he and his family. Let's not be delusional.
What's good for us is good for all... View attachment 50486
Late night decisions behind closed doors, deadlines for turning in banned mags, destruction of firearms with no passing down or inheritance of firearms....
How do they actually believe this protects from ANY criminal
They don't. That is not their goal. Their goal is no gun ownership. Which the bill helps accomplish. They are evil, not stupid, just like rosenthal, Linsky,etc
True. However I would argue that the risk to the presidential family is much more "managed" than the everyday risks we and our families face on a daily basis: Crackheads, robbers and everyday dickheads at the supermarket.
How about WE BAN NEW YORK. I travelled there last year. I vacationed there last year. I shot a tournament there last year. I will not do it again. In fact If I go to Camp Perry this Year, I'll go thru PA. instead of giving NY any more Money.
True. However I would argue that the risk to the presidential family is much more "managed" than the everyday risks we and our families face on a daily basis: Crackheads, robbers and everyday dickheads at the supermarket.