So Cuomo no longer needs any security since NY is safe.... Right?

Rating - 100%
61   0   0
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
367
Likes
34
Location
South Shore, MA
What's good for us is good for all...
image.jpg
Late night decisions behind closed doors, deadlines for turning in banned mags, destruction of firearms with no passing down or inheritance of firearms....

How do they actually believe this protects from ANY criminal
 
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
387
Likes
85
Location
Central Massachusetts
i have seen that. But, the analogy is a little off. He is the president of the USA. I can appreciate the point, but nobody here is even close to being at as much risk as he and his family. Let's not be delusional.
 
Rating - 100%
61   0   0
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
367
Likes
34
Location
South Shore, MA
We all understand that... Thanks captain obvious

The point is the changes change NOTHING because the criminal element really gives a sh** about the 'new regulations' that will keep us All so safe
 

DarrenL

NES Member
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
2,157
Likes
1,289
Location
An Ebola Free zone
What's good for us is good for all...
View attachment 50486
Late night decisions behind closed doors, deadlines for turning in banned mags, destruction of firearms with no passing down or inheritance of firearms....

How do they actually believe this protects from ANY criminal

They don't. That is not their goal. Their goal is no gun ownership. Which the bill helps accomplish. They are evil, not stupid, just like rosenthal, Linsky,etc
 
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Messages
755
Likes
111
Location
is everything
True. However I would argue that the risk to the presidential family is much more "managed" than the everyday risks we and our families face on a daily basis: Crackheads, robbers and everyday dickheads at the supermarket.
 
Top Bottom