Full text of the bill can be seen here.
Full Text of S. 33: Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2013 - GovTrack.us
Based on the language:
"that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or
converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition;"
Does that mean that any 10 round magazine that accepts a readily available "+1" or "+2" base extension would be banned as a high capacity magazine? With no additional clarifying language, it could certainly be read that way.
Those words are disconcerting.
So we know who our friends are. /sarcasm
this ^^ clause grandfather's what exists already.
This ^^ is how they will know when it was made.
This is a suck ass law but likely to be seen by many as a 'good compromise' on 'reasonable restrictions.'
I am planning on calling my Senators tomorrow to oppose this. I may also call the Senators who are proposing it and a few Senators who are Pro 2A to let them know how I feel. Now, to find a senator who is pro 2A.