E
esamjj
I believe the listed firearms under copy/dup are/were machine guns (full auto) according to the ATF. So of course machine guns were ban previously.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
It doesn't look like AR's are involved, so this case won't figure into the debate.
I am not normally political, but I will really work hard at Baker not being our next republican governor candidate.
Bill #SD.2637 An Act clarifying firearms oversight
https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/SD2637
Colt ar15 is on the state approved large capacity roster along with others.
This has zero chance of passing, unfortunately.
He has already chosen sides on this issue. And it WILL be the END of his political career. Not sure if he knows that yet or not.
As I live in Boston, its futile but it's sent to anyone who represents me here.
Good evening Senator Forry,
As you must know by now, our Attorney General has decided on her own accord to reinterpret a law that has been on the books for over two decades. That her predecessors had never found the reason to "reinterpret". By doing this she created a convoluted mush of questions from legal gun owners and inadvertently made many of them, including myself, unassuming felons.
Wherever we all stand on the rights of gun owners, the status of banning or limiting so called "assault weapons", we can agree that laws are not to be applied ex post facto, and they are to be discussed and approved in the public forum by the legislators elected. Not reinterpreted by one person with an obvious political agenda.
I appreciate the work that you do for our city and admire your courage to always voice your opinion. I ask that you voice ours for once, legal gun owners throughout this great state, and vote for Senator Humason's Bill.
Thank you for your time,
Boston, Ma
Bill #SD.2637 An Act clarifying firearms oversight
https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/SD2637
Is this like impeachment?
No, it would stop all future and past AG gun control measures and return power back to the legislation where it belongs.Is this like impeachment?
No, it would stop all future and past AG gun control measures and return power back to the legislation where it belongs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
NO, this removes any power the AG thought that she/he might have had over the regulation of firearms. No only would this kill her latest "assault weapon" bullshit, but this would also kill her super secret handgun list crap. IT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT/ BENEFICIAL BILLS WE HAVE SEEN IN A LONG TIME.Is this like impeachment?
I'm sorry but you are wrong. Read the last sentence of the bill:But 131M would still be in effect so it really doesn't solve the issue at hand. It's a good gesture but it falls short.
If you are referring to the legislation regarding gun conto, then it is where it belongs, that is a different issue and removing the AGs power is not falling short. This is 2 completely different issue, try fighting one battle at a time, even this one will be tough enough.But 131M would still be in effect so it really doesn't solve the issue at hand. It's a good gesture but it falls short.
NO, this removes any power the AG thought that she/he might have had over the regulation of firearms. No only would this kill her latest "assault weapon" bullshit, but this would also kill her super secret handgun list crap. IT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT/ BENEFICIAL BILLS WE HAVE SEEN IN A LONG TIME.