Story here:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/20/scotus.internet.tobacco/index.html
Why should we care, you ask? Well, strike "Maine" insert "Massachusetts" and strike "tobacco" insert "ammunition." Does not this ruling provide solid precedent for the AG restrictions on interstate sale of ammo and components being declared unconstitutional? It sounds like the only exemption allowed by Congress is for alcohol sales (equally inane, IMHO).
For the lawyers on the Forum: is there some way this ruling could be used to allow us to openly purchase ammo from out-of-state vendors again? What would need to be done?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/20/scotus.internet.tobacco/index.html
Why should we care, you ask? Well, strike "Maine" insert "Massachusetts" and strike "tobacco" insert "ammunition." Does not this ruling provide solid precedent for the AG restrictions on interstate sale of ammo and components being declared unconstitutional? It sounds like the only exemption allowed by Congress is for alcohol sales (equally inane, IMHO).
For the lawyers on the Forum: is there some way this ruling could be used to allow us to openly purchase ammo from out-of-state vendors again? What would need to be done?