• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

School me on .223 and 5.56

I know .223 is the cousin of 5.56, and 5.56 can be of a higher pressure than .223 ....

So much so that many people will say not to run 5.56 in a rifle marked .223

X for civilian M for Military right?

now tell me about 193 vs 855

In your run of the mill entry level AR with a non chromed barrel , say a 1 in 8 twist rate what would be the best plinking ammo?

Does Steel Core ammo cause any more wear to the barrel than non steel core?

Steel case vs brass cased pro's and cons?

This is a subject I am completely in the dark about and I'd like to be able to give a proper answer if asked about it.

This guy is who I watched religiously to learn reloading. Ultimate Reloader on YouTube.


Click me
 
I have 2 retired armorers one from the army the other from marines they where both in for the tail end of the M1a and many years through the AR variant
The both say the same thing
If it pukes on steel cased ammo theres something wrong.

During the ammo shortage after Sandy I even reloaded steel case ammo
I have also run cast in the AR

Its all part of the game

I have bags of Wolf Poly Performance .223 steel casings. They are Boxer primed and I've reloaded about 3k of them. It's winter ammo when "brass" gets lost in the snow or shooting somewhere where retrieval is a PITA.

I've also reloaded Wolf steel cased .45acp and .308. If the Wolf 9mm was Boxer primed, I'd have reloaded the shit out of it by the pallet, but it is all Berdan.
 
doge-ammo-450x297.jpg

Don't run 5.56 NATO in guns marked .223 Remington because 5.56 NATO is higher pressure.
 
Last edited:
Is it or is the nato testing procedure result in a different pressure reading?
The longer technical explanation from Hornday: @appraiser
The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi.

The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin.

The biggest problem with these differences is when firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in a rifle chambered for 223 Rem. Due to the longer throat that the NATO chamber employs this combination will cause a 223 chambered weapon to run at approximately 65,000 psi or more. This is 10,000 psi higher than the 223’s normal functioning pressure of 55,000 psi. This is NOT safe and will cause primers to back out, or worse, cause harm to the operator, the rifle, or both.

The reverse of this is firing a 223 Rem cartridge in a 5.56 NATO chambered rifle. Due to the throat difference between the two chambers a 223 Rem cartridge may not work optimally in a 5.56 NATO chambered weapon. The cause of this is the lack of pressure built by a 223 Rem cartridge fired from a 5.56 NATO chamber. The 223’s 55,000 psi will not be attained and therefore velocity and performance are hurt. Problems start occurring when this combination is fired out of a 5.56 NATO chambered rifle with a 14.5” (or shorter) barrel. The lower powder charge of the 223 round coupled with the pressure drop that occurs when it is fired in a the 5.56 NATO chamber will cause the rifle to cycle improperly. NATO chambered rifles with barrels longer than 14.5” should function properly when firing 223 Rem ammunition.
 
Is it or is the nato testing procedure result in a different pressure reading?
It is. Aside from observable velocity differences and the word of Black Hills, here are some data all using the same sensor position and methodology. Orrr, you can go by what Wikipedia says.

DBF41618-70B6-46B4-9FDA-ED73EFC58FD7.png
030BE474-5279-4EF8-B1C7-78138AAC4E68.png
6FE8A5A0-0C93-43C6-8132-80DA560F190D.png
D9C73C33-9E11-4888-8B8C-80383179B098.png
D7F1C3FD-E408-4133-9231-F8D29E8E8EC2.png
9759BDB0-8BFA-4DAE-B4F9-7A625A46E760.png
 
It's THE SAME FRIGGIN CASE!

You can blow a rifle in a number of ways. Using the wrong powder is the best way. But, commercial/govt 5.56 ammo is not loaded to such a high pressure that its going to blow a 223 chambered rifle.
It just isnt.
 
It's THE SAME FRIGGIN CASE!

You can blow a rifle in a number of ways. Using the wrong powder is the best way. But, commercial/govt 5.56 ammo is not loaded to such a high pressure that its going to blow a 223 chambered rifle.
It just isnt.
I don’t think anybody has said anything counter to that.

But the pressures are different. And a 5.56 cartridge in a .223 chamber can yield a higher pressure than that same cartridge in a 5.66 chamber.
 
I don’t think anybody has said anything counter to that.

But the pressures are different. And a 5.56 cartridge in a .223 chamber can yield a higher pressure than that same cartridge in a 5.66 chamber.
High enough to cause a problem?
 
High enough to cause a problem?
According to Hornady for the 2nd time:
The biggest problem with these differences is when firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in a rifle chambered for 223 Rem. Due to the longer throat that the NATO chamber employs this combination will cause a 223 chambered weapon to run at approximately 65,000 psi or more. This is 10,000 psi higher than the 223’s normal functioning pressure of 55,000 psi. This is NOT safe and will cause primers to back out, or worse, cause harm to the operator, the rifle, or both.
 
High enough to cause a problem?
Higher than the 114psi difference that has been claimed in this thread. Unlikely to cause a problem, but yes, potentially high enough to cause a problem. M855A1 aside, commercial loads at 5.56 pressures could pop primers and cause issues in your trigger group, as one example.

But no, it won’t likely blow up your gun. Which I totally agree with you on. But if you have a 223 gun and 5.56 ammo, run it until you see pressure signs. No pressure signs, keep shooting.
 
I know .223 is the cousin of 5.56, and 5.56 can be of a higher pressure than .223 ....

So much so that many people will say not to run 5.56 in a rifle marked .223

X for civilian M for Military right?

now tell me about 193 vs 855

In your run of the mill entry level AR with a non chromed barrel , say a 1 in 8 twist rate what would be the best plinking ammo?

Does Steel Core ammo cause any more wear to the barrel than non steel core?

Steel case vs brass cased pro's and cons?

This is a subject I am completely in the dark about and I'd like to be able to give a proper answer if asked about it.
I heard the "warnings" from the "experts" many times. A strong, modern bolt-action will handle 5.56mm just fine. I ran NATO 5.56mm through my Savage bolt gun with no problems whatsoever. Check the cases and primers of the first few rounds. Cracked case mouths, bulged cases and protruding primers are excessive-pressure warnings. If this happens to you, stop using that ammo immediately!
 
I can tell you from experience that steel case will break your extractors. I went through 2 of them in about 400 rounds plus multiple malfunctions with every magazine. I bought a 1000 rounds of it on the cheap and I was stubborn, I was determined to shoot all 1000 rounds. I have 600 rounds of steel case for sale.😂👍🏻
No problems with brass, just the steel?
 
Higher than the 114psi difference that has been claimed in this thread. Unlikely to cause a problem, but yes, potentially high enough to cause a problem. M855A1 aside, commercial loads at 5.56 pressures could pop primers and cause issues in your trigger group, as one example.

But no, it won’t likely blow up your gun. Which I totally agree with you on. But if you have a 223 gun and 5.56 ammo, run it until you see pressure signs. No pressure signs, keep shooting.
Ok, next question: do you know of anybody using FACTORY ammo who has popped a primer? Someone who doesn't have a chewed-up firing pin to begin with? Handloaders, yes, especially if you're pushing heavy bullets. I've done it dozens of times. But factory 5.56 in a 223 chamber? I've never heard of it.
According to Hornady for the 2nd time:
I don't trust Hornady's advice. They can't even make a 75gr bullet that will get all the way to the target.



EDIT: I just re-read everything I've posted in this thread and I'll just say this:
If you are at all nervous about chamber pressures, don't use 5.56 ammo in a standard SAAMI 223 chamber. The worst thing that will happen is you might pop a primer, but if that makes you nervous, don't do it.
 
Last edited:
I’ve got about 1,000+ rounds of silver bear 223 and Tula 223 through my bear creek arsenal upper without a single malfunction. I realize 1k isn’t much but so far so good.
 
Four months and you are going to slag a senior (to you) guy who asked a legitimate question? People can be enthusiasts without knowing a thing about certain guns.

You gotta know when to shit talk and when there's a legitimate quest for information.
Lol, senior member…. There’s no slang here and He provided a resource of value relevant to the OPs question, relax.
I know .223 is the cousin of 5.56, and 5.56 can be of a higher pressure than .223 ....

So much so that many people will say not to run 5.56 in a rifle marked .223

X for civilian M for Military right?

now tell me about 193 vs 855

In your run of the mill entry level AR with a non chromed barrel , say a 1 in 8 twist rate what would be the best plinking ammo?

Does Steel Core ammo cause any more wear to the barrel than non steel core?

Steel case vs brass cased pro's and cons?

This is a subject I am completely in the dark about and I'd like to be able to give a proper answer if asked about it.
Steel core - Steel core is typical coated with lube (lacquer?) to provide more reliable feeding and to provide a sacrificial surface between the steel case and the steel chamber. Steel case Ammo can be hard on extractors and I guess if you run thousands and thousands of rounds wear your chamber prematurely. Personally I have never run any in my guns, but have some in reserve in case supplies run low

Rate of twist - back in the day when lighter was perceived as better for .223 / 5.56 twist rates were 1:10 or 1:12 for 45grn projectiles. Today 55grn is really the lightest, with all sorts of terrific factory rounds loaded from 62grn to 77grn these are better for both distance shooting and defensive purposes. A 1:7 or 1:8 will stabilize the vast majority of 55-77grn loads and would likely be your best bet for versatility.

193 vs 855 - 193 = 55grn metal jacket. Ok accuracy, general use round. 855 = steel penetrator for enhanced penetration of solid objects and “armor” (not truly and armor piercing round) 855 is garbage accuracy for any sort of precision work.

X vs M = I believe commercial market is sold “X” designation as they are technically for military contract (same production line) but did not meet quality standards in some way. I don’t know this as fact, and may perhaps be repeating myth or rumor.

5.56 and .223 are different ANSI / SAAMI pressure specs with 5.56 being the higher of the two. Technically, no you cannot run 5.56 in .223 but that may only in reality pertain to shitty old Remingtons sold through Dicks sporting goods. If you are looking at something chambered in .223 Wylde, 5.56 is perfect
 
Not a troll post, genuinely intrigued - you've been a NES member and supposed gun enthusiast with likes in the ten thousands and don't know?
This actually hits the perfect NES balance. I'm thumbs up on this post. Knowing that Appraiser is a pistol dude makes part of the difference.

I feel @G4Y4HK was very honest in asking for boundary conditions and assumptions.

On other sites, asking about the difference between .223 and 5.56 is like banging everyone's wives, upperdeckering all toliets and the kitchen sink and throwing the keys on the roof.

This site has more... Diverse. Culture.

Range to target, type of target, twist of barrel, length of barrel. Those to me are required to select round choice, with the variables being grain, type of bullet, load, case.

Just like with .30-06, but with less options on the shelf at Walmart.
 
I wouldn’t run steel through any AR platform except my MCX or any other piston driven. The bolt being on a set of springs is the only reason why is my theory. I tried numerous times in all my different AR’s and it’s a malfunction every time, especially in winter. I’ve gone through 2 extractors with a very, very low round count. Brass only for me. As far as 223 vs 5.56…which ever is available and stay the hell away from NATO green tip. It blows and you can’t even shoot steel with it anyway.
Interesting? Are these with good quality non-guchi bolts?

I buy mid level, and have had zero issues. I also headspace all my builds, disassemble, clean and lube all BCGs before initial use and after the anodizing gets scored in at a few mags deep.

I also carefully match buffer and spring and tube to gas length.

The only issue I had was with a "make do" $69.99 BCG and the WRONG setup. Carbine gas system plus rifle buffer spring and buffer. (Or it may have been opposite. Carbine spring setup and buffer and rifle or mid gas. I can't remember. )

After a few mags and some fail to feed after extract, I stopped and took apart the BCG. Wear I didn't expect on extractor. Stopped and went back to basics. Realized I'd don't things backwards and crossed up.

Bolt is sitting in a spares box.

These DI guns let you know pretty quick if they are out of balance.
 
Interesting? Are these with good quality non-guchi bolts?

I buy mid level, and have had zero issues. I also headspace all my builds, disassemble, clean and lube all BCGs before initial use and after the anodizing gets scored in at a few mags deep.

I also carefully match buffer and spring and tube to gas length.

The only issue I had was with a "make do" $69.99 BCG and the WRONG setup. Carbine gas system plus rifle buffer spring and buffer. (Or it may have been opposite. Carbine spring setup and buffer and rifle or mid gas. I can't remember. )

After a few mags and some fail to feed after extract, I stopped and took apart the BCG. Wear I didn't expect on extractor. Stopped and went back to basics. Realized I'd don't things backwards and crossed up.

Bolt is sitting in a spares box.

These DI guns let you know pretty quick if they are out of balance.
I don’t know what it was. The headspace issue makes sense. But it would not shoot out of three different BCG’s.
 
The longer technical explanation from Hornday: @appraiser
Are they saying the longer throat increases case capacity?
Or
Are they saying because of the longer throat “they” need to load more powder to get the velocity they need out of the loose NATO chamber.
I know its a beaten to death subject and all the same shit goes round and round.
You can load 223/556 to say a reduced load to achieve 2500 fps but if the bullet ogive jams the lands its going to be over pressure and thats what was happening with the older 223 rifles when 5.56 NATO became available to joe public.
If you test 223 ammo and 5.56 ammo loaded to specification in the same testing equipment it would have aprox the same pressures.
 
Last edited:
gun sez "5.56", you can fire both
gun sex .223, you might get in trouble firing 5.56, due to a slightly larger case dimension

that is all i know
 
Are they saying the longer throat increases case capacity?
Or
Are they saying because of the longer throat “they” need to load more powder to get the velocity they need out of the loose NATO chamber.
I know its a beaten to death subject and all the same shit goes round and round.
You can load 223/556 to say a reduced load to achieve 2500 fps but if the bullet ogive jams the lands its going to be over pressure and thats what was happening with the older 223 rifles when 5.56 NATO became available to joe public.
If you test 223 ammo and 5.56 ammo loaded to specification in the same testing equipment it would have aprox the same pressures.
I believe they’re saying that a 5.56 chamber will result in lower chamber pressure for the same amount of powder, so you can add a little extra powder before reaching the same chamber pressure as a .223 chamber.

Edit: but of course that is dependent on not maxing out physical space with a bulky stick powder.

gun sez "5.56", you can fire both
gun sex .223, you might get in trouble firing 5.56, due to a slightly larger case dimension

that is all i know

No case dimension difference.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom