If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Good point. I was interested in putting a scar17 together, but after pricing it out with optics and such, it seems like a crazy amount of money. I'm thinking an Ar-10 would be better , or simply keeping my M1As.I stopped caring about that bullshit years ago. It's pretty liberating. Besides if someone is a total cuck you can use modified FAL mags in a SCAR anyways, iirc.
I'm not here to bash the SCAR, but I do have questions. What is the attraction? I did a search to find discussions by actual owners - all I got was pages of people trying to sell them. They appear to be:
2. Fuggly (at least from the bolt, backwards)
3. Of average performance.
What am I missing? Any thoughts from owners? AITA?
I would get one without thinking twice. Most people here the most experience they have with one is watching YouTube videos or parroting information. Maybe they shot one at the range or their butt buddy owns one.
I would buy a SCAR if the price wasn't stupid $2800 is f***ing stupid for what should be a gun that costs no more than a couple of grand.
I get it price wise, however look at the prices of mainstream ARs and some of the actually better ones will run you the same. Sometimes even more. It’s definitely not for everyone but it comes with everything you need right out of the box.
Lol comparing it to an AR? it's not an AR-anything. And if you really want to go down that road it looks especially bad. On paper the value prop of their guns is f***ing
terrible. $2800, still doesnt have optics on it. not "everything you need"
Good on FN for getting the $$$$ though. And anyone who wants to buy it, should. It's not a horrible gun, even if the value prop is shit.
Pretty sure you know there are plenty of piston ARs out there that go that much. By that definition nothing is really a good proposition, manufacturers produce what people and the market demands. People still drop $1k or more on junk Sigs. Point is, you are getting stifled no matter what in today’s
Thank you, that's very neighborly of you. I appreciate the owners perspective and may be in touch to take you up on that.OP, if you have any questions about scars DM me. I have used 3 different ones across multiple mil, Leo and some pretty interesting competitions. Also if you want to shoot one bring some ammo
Yeah but a SCAR always had that shit price. The price is only $2800 because of some gun shop commando faggots drooling. "PBWERWERAEAJOFDOFJEFJDFSAFBBB!!!! SOCOMMM!!!! SPECSHUL FORCES! PFFFFBBTTTTT! GET ME A DIAT COAKE WITH MUH BIG MACS! PEE WEE!"
It's $2800 because they can get 2800 bucks, but dont mean its really worth that.
It's like when the FS2000 used to be a $1300 gun. Then magically overnight, it disappeared. Then they saw people starting to ejac over it and it came back at $1899 or whatever the f*** they sold those things at before it stopped selling.
Again review my comment above about people parroting info that goes both ways. Maybe my price to value prop is skewed because I paid $2100 plus tax. People spent too much time money on YouTube influencers and products that they are paid to push which also drive price and demand.
And frankly...if you take away all of the issues of scarcity/socom-branding/tacticool influence/Market panic, etc... is there really any basic firearm worth more than $1500-$2000.If you only paid $2100 you either got in early or did well or were at the right place. I've literally never seen them that cheap. Maybe they were years ago.
I've fired the things before, both 308 and 556 versions. They are nice guns. For 2 grand, maybe.
And frankly...if you take away all of the issues of scarcity/socom-branding/tacticool influence/Market panic, etc... is there really any basic firearm worth more than $1500-$2000.
That's always been my beef with it, and 2 years ago proved this theory when I built my SPR. I wanted one for a hot minute because I wanted a rifle that folded, I ended up buying a Gen 1 MCX for almost half the price of a new SCAR and it does more of what I want then the SCAR ever would.For the price of a bare SCAR, you could have a 0.5 MOA rifle, including glass.
In a 5.56 I would much prefer my FS2000
Yup. The SCAR-L/16 might as well disappear into oblivion. Want a piston 5.56 gun? Then go for a MCX or PWS. No purpose to the SCAR-L.USSOCOM came to a similar conclusion, albeit a different "already have this 5.56 gun", gun. They deemed the SCAR-L redundant to M4 variants, and the commonality of parts to the SCAR-H didn't really matter when operators of the SCAR-H didn't bother with the downgrade in caliber exchange. That's a good part of the reason they discontinued the SCAR-L for service use.
If I were going to dump $4k on a SCAR, I'd want the 7.62 version. Totally moot, as I don't have $4k to drop on a single rifle purchase, but just saying...
still, demanding a $4k+ for any nato 5.56 or .308 gun is very odd in my mind. you cannot argue with collectors who will pay any $ for an item they want, but, there are limits to anything.Yup. The SCAR-L/16 might as well disappear into oblivion. Want a piston 5.56 gun? Then go for a MCX or PWS. No purpose to the SCAR-L.
The SCAR-H/17 is a legitimate lightweight battle rifle, but I have no need for it. And if you want a more precise 7.62 rifle, well there are better AR-10/SR-25 variants. Want a piston with your precision, look no further than the G28/Mister 762.
Yeah, I was thinking from a military procurement standpoint. From a civilian standpoint, the H&K offering is just silly expensive. KAC as well, but not as bad as H&K.still, demanding a $4k+ for any nato 5.56 or .308 gun is very odd in my mind. you cannot argue with collectors who will pay any $ for an item they want, but, there are limits to anything.