Am I right to infer that this now sets precedent so that all the US territories may get Constitutional Carry now with a little more legal action by SAF?
Am I right to infer that this now sets precedent so that all the US territories may get Constitutional Carry now with a little more legal action by SAF?
We can expect this to get overturned (as was the case in Maryland for shall-issue), or alternatively, have PR put another licensing system in place that limits access to those of privilege, power and influence.
Presently, PR does not reciprocate with any state. Interestingly, they also do not offer non-resident licenses. I own a home there so simply obtained a resident permit. The process definitely involves some bureaucracy but from date of application to receipt of permit was roughly 40 days.