But you still have a SUBPAR machine when compared to the Dillon. Cost is not as big an issue to me as quality is MUCH more important.
I've never loaded on a LNL so I can't say that it isn't a quality piece as I'm sure it is but compared to Dillon
So, you've never used the Hornady but the Dillon is better? Why, because you have a Dillon? Well, as long as you have an informed opinion.
Comparing an L-N-L to a Dillon 550 is not a fair comparison. It's more like a 650, but with a better powder measure. I know because I've actually used them both.
Just because something has been around longer doesn't mean that it's better. VHS was around for years, under your logic, it must mean that VHS is better than DVD.
Someone (I'm not sure if it was this thread or another) mentioned a survey that said that 90% of competitive shooters load on a Dillon. This does not surprise me in the least; the reason for this is in your post PistolPete: The Dillon has been around
much longer than the L-N-L AP.
Think about it. Let's say that in January Lee starts producing a cast iron machine that is a modern copy of the old Star Progressive Reloader (the Dillon 1050 is a cheaper version of the Star), but modified so that it could load rifle or pistol, loaded up with modern features, with a case feeder and bullet loader on it, and a price tag of $350. Let's also say that this machine gets rave reviews everywhere. Such a press would immediately make all other progressive machines obsolete. And yet if you surveyed competitive shooters in April and asked them what kind of a press they used, 90% would say Dillon. Why? Because nobody is going to throw out a perfectly good machine to get the latest thing - no matter how good a deal it is. I'd be interested to see a survey that asked shooters which presses they've bought in the last six months.
I really don't have a dog in this race. The first press I ever owned was a Dillon Square Deal (that I sold to Dwarven1). I have both a Dillon 550 that I bought, and a Hornady L-N-L that I received as a gift. Both are quality machines (calling either "subpar" is just absurd) and both companies have excellent customer service. You won't go wrong with either company. Dillon has been making progressive presses longer, but Hornady isn't exactly a fly-by-night outfit (just for the record, they've been around as a company longer than Dillon, and they've been in the press business since 1972 when they bought Pacific).
Having real experience with both machines, if/when I buy another progressive press, I will get a Hornady L-N-L AP over a Dillon 650 because it is a better value. I think for myself, and therefore don't care how many people use the Dillon. I'm also not affected by other Dillon users badmouthing all the other presses. The Dillon is a fine machine - I know because I have one, the Hornady is a better deal - I know because I have one of those too.