• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Red Flag Laws Spur Debate Over Due Process

Reptile

NES Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
27,998
Likes
20,267
Feedback: 123 / 0 / 0
In the year since Florida enacted its red flag law, Kendra Parris has defended nearly 20 clients against risk protection orders that could remove their firearms.

The Orlando-based lawyer has long represented people who might be subject to the state’s involuntary mental health treatment provision. But when this new law, meant to protect against people who might be a harm to themselves or others, passed in the aftermath of the February 2018 Parkland mass shooting, she saw yet another opportunity for the state to potentially deprive certain people of their civil liberties.

“It’s almost like a shiny new toy for law enforcement,” Parris said, “filing them left and right.”

Since the law’s adoption, Florida courts have approved around 2,500 risk protection orders, according to an August count by NPR.

Since Parkland, at least six states and the District of Columbia have passed red flag laws, which allow law enforcement agencies that have gotten a court order to remove guns from people considered a harm to themselves or others. In the wake of high-profile shootings this summer in Ohio and Texas, including one that killed eight people in Midland-Odessa this past weekend, more state lawmakers are considering such laws, as are some members of Congress.

Red Flag Laws Spur Debate Over Due Process
 
The problem is that there is even a "debate over due process". It shouldn't even have to BE debated, due process is a f***ing right. Oh no, but we can't have that, "cuz its guns, so everything is special, we need to make considerations for vyolence by guns blah blah". I'd love to see someone like say, Clarence Thomas quietly get up from a chair and just slap someone right across the face right after they were done uttering that bullshit.

-Mike
 
The problem is that there is even a "debate over due process". It shouldn't even have to BE debated, due process is a f***ing right. Oh no, but we can't have that, "cuz its guns, so everything is special, we need to make considerations for vyolence by guns blah blah". I'd love to see someone like say, Clarence Thomas quietly get up from a chair and just slap someone right across the face right after they were done uttering that bullshit.

-Mike
Exactly!!!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom