If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
only pre-ban is a pre-1994, that would allow not to pin the muzzle break, etc. AKs specifically it is probably worth it, but, prices now make it unreasonable. just build an AR from a stripped lower and ignore all this BS.Why are people advertising “Pre Healy” ar’s for sale like she’s god and she made a new law??? This Is a honestly question I’m not trying to be a jerk here to please thanks.
this whole 'edict' thing only confuses new people and gives absolutely 0 sense of what it actually means from the ownership or build perspective. it took me quite a bit of time to comprehend as well, as it is misrepresented on purpose in a lot of selling ads, with no good comprehensible explanations posted anywhere.I do wish we would change the preferred nomenclature to “pre-edict” so as not to give that c*** any more notoriety. Just sayin.
The exact opposite is true, because in one word it accurately details that it is not indeed law.this whole 'edict' thing only confuses new people and gives absolutely 0 sense of what it actually means from the ownership or build perspective. it took me quite a bit of time to comprehend as well, as it is misrepresented on purpose in a lot of selling ads, with no good comprehensible explanations posted anywhere.
in the current political climate any owner of the any registered AR lower is a violator, so, in case of any doubts - do not get it, that`s all.Because the She said after Xday you get into trouble the rest of us with pre X day rifles she has not decided to come after us “yet”
Well, if you read the thing her claim is that they're all "bad". It's not even worth caring about, honestly.
that is exactly were confusion breeds - the mixing up of all the facts of what an FFL business can sell with what a private citizen can own/build, then with what an existing lawful owner can re-sell, etc.Tell that to the FFL’s that don’t sell new AR’s, which is all of them in MA. A lower here and there, sure. But no one is bringing in and selling new AR’s. Well, at least that I know of. I’m often wrong.
Yes I totally agree I think we should never mention her in any way or even acknowledge the face she Exist LOL honestly they want us to be afraid of nothing then they will WINHere's an honest answer:
She made a statement, that made people sh*t their pants. And she gave a short window where she said she wouldn't follow up with any prosecution, but did leave it open that should could follow up. Will she? Who knows with her. If she did, and you wanted to fight it, then you could.... it would cost you a lot of legal fees. Would you win? Probably, but who knows in this state.
So because of that, people wanted to avoid any problems and lots of money lost in lawyers. Some people pay for all kinds of insurance / extended warranties and some people don't
For others, they know it's not the law, and its bark and not bite.
And as for not mentioning her name anywhere, I agree. I'm sure she and her team scan this site every day for her name.