If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
This happened about 6(??) months ago when ATF came out with their “rule”. They were no longer allowed to sell jigs and frames together. So many companies split them up and established separate businesses: one for selling frames and one for selling jigs.
This happened about 6(??) months ago when ATF came out with their “rule”. They were no longer allowed to sell jigs and frames together. So many companies split them up and established separate businesses: one for selling frames and one for selling jigs.
Since then, the rule was challenged in court and a judge issues a nationwide block on the rule. Vendors that were part of the lawsuit have already started selling frames and jigs together again. Looks like theseg guys did not join the lawsuit or the website is out of date.
That’s an email boss. Not the website.This happened about 6(??) months ago when ATF came out with their “rule”. They were no longer allowed to sell jigs and frames together. So many companies split them up and established separate businesses: one for selling frames and one for selling jigs.
Since then, the rule was challenged in court and a judge issues a nationwide block on the rule. Vendors that were part of the lawsuit have already started selling frames and jigs together again. Looks like theseg guys did not join the lawsuit or the website is out of date.
That’s an email boss. Not the website.
you're kidding, right?Well, none of you clowns respond with info unless you get to dunk on Sammy. So.. you’re welcome for my service to the community!
How about ACTUAL information. You just parrot what other have incorrectly stated. Me? I slap those who are too lazy to google shit:you're kidding, right?
They literally posted the email that the vendor in question just sent to their customers. Then you came in, throwing incorrect assumptions around, and they provided the correct answers you could've as quickly searched for yourself.
Tell us again, what service did you provide?
How about ACTUAL information. You just parrot what other have incorrectly stated. Me? I slap those who are too lazy to google shit:
Polymer80 PF9SS™ 80% Single-Stack Frame and Jig Kit (Glock® 43 Compatible)
The everyday carry we have all been waiting for to build has arrived. Polymer80 has released an 80% Pistol Single-Stack Frame & Jig Kit.www.80-lower.com
WAIT!!!! Someone said you can’t order frame and jig together and you just tried to pile on without basic research.
Aug 08 2023 Application (23A82) for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The June 30, 2023 order and July 5, 2023 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, case No. 4:22-cv-691, insofar as they vacate the final rule of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 87 Fed. Reg. 24652 (April 26, 2022), are stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would deny the application for stay.
Attorneys for Respondents Charles Randall Flores
Counsel of RecordFlores Law PLLC
917 Franklin Street
Suite 600
Houston, TX 77002
[email protected]713-893-9444 Party name: Defense Distributed Charles Randall Flores Flores Law PLLC
917 Franklin Street
Suite 600
Houston, TX 77002
[email protected]713-893-9444 Party name: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. Michael James Sullivan
Counsel of RecordAshcroft Law Firm, LLC
200 State Street, 7th Floor
Boston, MA 02109
[email protected]6175739400 Party name: BlackHawk Manufacturing Group, Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms David H. Thompson
Counsel of RecordCooper & Kirk, PLLC
1523 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
[email protected]202-220-9600 Party name: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. Charles Randall Flores
Counsel of RecordFlores Law PLLC
917 Franklin Street
Suite 600
Houston, TX 77002
[email protected]713-893-9444 Party name: Defense Distributed; Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.; Not An LLC, LLC, doing business as JSD Supply
How about ACTUAL information. You just parrot what other have incorrectly stated. Me? I slap those who are too lazy to google shit:
Polymer80 PF9SS™ 80% Single-Stack Frame and Jig Kit (Glock® 43 Compatible)
The everyday carry we have all been waiting for to build has arrived. Polymer80 has released an 80% Pistol Single-Stack Frame & Jig Kit.www.80-lower.com
WAIT!!!! Someone said you can’t order frame and jig together and you just tried to pile on without basic research.
You realize that 80% Arms is actually one of the members in the VanDerStok case, 80-lower is not. That someone is continuing to sell in contravention of the current state of the case doesn't change the information provided by an actual party to the case.
Eh, are you really that lazy? Click on the FDE color, you dummy!You realize that link says out of stock, right? As in, they marked it as out of stock because they can’t sell it. These companies leave the products up so they can turn sales back on easily if litigation comes back in our favor.
Again, you’re posting incorrect crap.
Again, you're too lazy to even click on other frame colors on the page or look at other offerings from the store.But they’re not even selling anything. He’s again spouting garbage.
You really ought to google more! You are pointing to the old order which indeed stayed the blocking of the rule. What you didn't do is actually READ the order. It basically stayed the order and remanded to 5th District Court of appeals for a proper decision! Which 5th district court HAD ISSUED on November 9th!
You realize that 80% Arms is actually one of the members in the VanDerStok case, 80-lower is not. That someone is continuing to sell in contravention of the current state of the case doesn't change the information provided by an actual party to the case.
Again, you're too lazy to even click on other frame colors on the page or look at other offerings from the store.
You really ought to google more! You are pointing to the old order which indeed stayed the blocking of the rule. What you didn't do is actually READ the order. It basically stayed the order and remanded to 5th District Court of appeals for a proper decision! Which 5th district court HAD ISSUED on November 9th!
why don't read to the end, for once:
VanDerStok v. Garland, No. 23-10718 (5th Cir. 2023)
In April of 2022,the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,and Explosives (“ATF”)issued a Final Rule in which the terms “firearm” and “frame or receiver,” among others, were given “an updated, more comprehensive definition. The Final Rule was almost immediately the subject of litigation claiming...law.justia.com