****PLEASE SIGN THIS AND SPREAD IT OUT ****

docak47

NES Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
736
Likes
599
Feedback: 14 / 0 / 0
Good evening everyone, just wanted to share that the anti gun ban petition to reverse the latest infringement on our 2A has been spread around to most of the gun shops and gun clubs in the state please make sure you find a location and sign the petition and please register to vote if you aren't already registered, also spread the word around to family members and friends as every signature counts.


Screenshot_20241002_084722_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
Already voted. Need to have my wife sign it with a few friends…. Is it possible to print out a sheet and collect signatures in my town? All registered voters
Thanks
 
S
Already voted. Need to have my wife sign it with a few friends…. Is it possible to print out a sheet and collect signatures in my town? All registered voters
Thanks
yes you can go to the link below and sign up under the volunteer section to become a town rep or a sight for collecting signatures in a town or helping out in many ways.

Fight Back
 
Thank you.. Just signed up and I urge others to do the same. Lot's of friends of mine have kids and/or work during the hours of signing at local clubs. I can get out to our local breakfast spot over the next few weeks and gather signatures from local registered voters that would not drive out to a voting site, like my wife... Earn your right to complain and volunteer....
 
Last edited:
It’s stickied btw
 
I don't think it will make it for this term and it will be for the next run in 2026, also depends on her reaction to it whether she signs the emergency action or not but either way the voters will have a shot at it like everything else.
 

Is the Big E owned or operated by the government? If not, this post (from a civil rights organization) makes us look like we don't understand civil rights on a fundamental level. The first amendment only protects people against government censorship. A non profit org is not the government, and cannot violate your right free speech when you are on their property.
I may misunderstand the circumstance here though. my only info is from this post.
 
Is the Big E owned or operated by the government? If not, this post (from a civil rights organization) makes us look like we don't understand civil rights on a fundamental level. The first amendment only protects people against government censorship. A non profit org is not the government, and cannot violate your right free speech when you are on their property.
I may misunderstand the circumstance here though. my only info is from this post.
I just checked my on x hunt ap and the land is private owned as ESE.....and run bu a not for profit board. It's not a government run thing and not on land owned by the government. So.....you would be correct......there is no 1a violation by kicking the petitioners out.
 
"they didn’t want any signs related to the Second Amendment or politics in the background of her visit"

Is she the Queen?
No politics? Sure sounds like their doing politics. Do they know she's a politician?
Private owned land......private run fair.

No 1a rights were violated.

Unfortunately.
 
So, I went to a LGS today to sign the petition. Or, I suppose, "sign" it. They were quite explicit. Print your name in this box. Print your address in that box. Don't use a signature, just your printed name so they can read it.

Since when? How is that verifiable? Regardless of this petition or any other subject, what's to stop someone from printing his name, his neighbor's, the friend who's out of town, and so on?
 
So, I went to a LGS today to sign the petition. Or, I suppose, "sign" it. They were quite explicit. Print your name in this box. Print your address in that box. Don't use a signature, just your printed name so they can read it.

Since when? How is that verifiable? Regardless of this petition or any other subject, what's to stop someone from printing his name, his neighbor's, the friend who's out of town, and so on?

I freely admit that my handwriting is abysmal. When I write something no one can read it, so if I signed the petition I'm sure my signature would be challenged.

I suspect that is why they asked people to print.
 
I freely admit that my handwriting is abysmal. When I write something no one can read it, so if I signed the petition I'm sure my signature would be challenged.

I suspect that is why they asked people to print.
I can see "Sign it then print your name", but just printing your name? How is that going to be verified? I don't think my bank would take me printing my name in the signature line of a check. I can't see why the town clerk will do so here.

950 CMR 55.03 (1)(b): The name is not signed substantially as registered - the registrars cannot identify the signature as that of a voter because of form of signature
IANAL, but I do know that I sure as hell didn't print my name on my voter registration form.
 
Last edited:
I can see "Sign it then print your name", but just printing your name? How is that going to be verified? I don't think my bank would take me printing my name in the signature line of a check. I can't see why the town clerk will do so here.

950 CMR 55.03 (1)(b): The name is not signed substantially as registered - the registrars cannot identify the signature as that of a voter because of form of signature
IANAL, but I do know that I sure as hell didn't print my name on my voter registration form.

I understand what you're saying, and I don't disagree about signing checks, contracts, registering to vote, etc.

My hope is that the petition organizers have already looked into the requirements for "signatures" and that the printed names are acceptable. 🤔
 
Has a consensus come as to the short term vs long term of the petition for it to go to ballot? Or is this different?
There is no consensus on the efficacy.
People will need to be adults and make their own choice on this.

Is the Big E owned or operated by the government? If not, this post (from a civil rights organization) makes us look like we don't understand civil rights on a fundamental level. The first amendment only protects people against government censorship. A non profit org is not the government, and cannot violate your right free speech when you are on their property.
I may misunderstand the circumstance here though. my only info is from this post.

Even if it is private the idea that another government official is using their power on a 3rd party to Silence you is kind of an infringement....
 
You're better off voting with your feet and getting out of that socialist sheethole and moving someplace else.
Let Maura bankrupt it feeding illegal aliens.
Until whatever state you move to begins shifting blue. While I don't disagree, states like ma and cali that do this are testing grounds for these laws to be done.

Politicians are going to the extremes to see what will stick, who will come out, what the courts say, etc and will not only push say an anti gun bill but will also continue to push the envelope on controversial and unconstitutional laws. Hell now Hillary is saying they should ban "misinformation"?! Newsom just signed a law against "anti deep fake"? You roll on one issue, they know you'll roll on another until we look like Maos China.

While ma isn't a strong pro 2a state by any means, that shouldn't prevent outside pro 2a groups or even companies from working, promoting etc here. You want to stick it to the grabbers? Do business and promote 2a then.
 
Back
Top Bottom