Shooting organizations have been known to come up with contorted interpretations of their own rules to obtain the outcome they want, regardless of the intent at the time the rule was passed. I've seen this done in cases where the rule was much clearer than the 2/3 voting members rule being discussed.I agree with the first half.
Again, we now have a copy of the letter. It's not an in-person vote. It's mail-in (with all the attendant comments about mail-in votes).