A good case, with a good decision despite a rather unsympathetic set of facts surrounding the defendant. Probably why the state let it get that far, hoping the weight of other aspects of the case would sway the Court.
“When many people are licensed to do something, and violate no law by doing that thing, common sense dictates that the police officer cannot assume that any given person doing it is breaking the law,” Justice David Wecht wrote in the court’s lead opinion.
All this means is they'll give another BS reason. "I smelled marijuana". Or they'll bring in a probable cause dog. If they want to search they will find a way.
All this means is they'll give another BS reason. "I smelled marijuana". Or they'll bring in a probable cause dog. If they want to search they will find a way.
Ruling changes nothing. Police have and will continue to search anyone they want for any reason they want. It will often remain illegal but it that’s rather moot when nothing happens to the cops anyways.
Ruling changes nothing. Police have and will continue to search anyone they want for any reason they want. It will often remain illegal but it that’s rather moot when nothing happens to the cops anyways.