• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Over One Million Gun Owners Refuse to Obey Ban, No One Turning in Magazines

“New Jersey’s law reasonably fits the State’s interest in public safety and does not unconstitutionally burden the Second Amendment’s right to self-defense in the home,” the court wrote in their decision. “The law also does not violate the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause because it does not require gun owners to surrender their magazines but instead allows them to retain modified magazines or register firearms that have magazines that cannot be modified.”

Question for you keyboard lawyers. Would it be reasonable to challenge based on the SCOTUS decision that these magazines are "in common use" and therefore can't be banned?

Yes, except it clearly states that they aren't banned and can simply be modified to be in compliance. This is the same way they went about limiting magazines in Canada back in the late 90s. A little metal pin drilled in the side decreasing the capacity to 10 for pistols and 5 for rifles.
 
this is what pisses me right the eff off...

"AG Gurbir Grewal applauded the ruling on Twitter stating: “This just in: for months, individuals have been challenging NJ’s limits on large capacity magazines—a sensible law to address mass shootings. Today, the court of appeals upheld the law. Big win for public safety and law enforcement safety!”

Specifically calling out all gun owners as mass shooters.

People like this AG are very dangerous to our republic.
Not shocked at all.
State of New Jersey
 
Yes, except it clearly states that they aren't banned and can simply be modified to be in compliance. This is the same way they went about limiting magazines in Canada back in the late 90s. A little metal pin drilled in the side decreasing the capacity to 10 for pistols and 5 for rifles.

Laughable.
 
A lot of NJ gun owners moved their firearms and magazines to store them out of state, to like PA, depending on where they live.
 
d9040a3ddc468d2efc08453582be2d6e.jpg
What happened to the Guntraband channel?
 
Will NJ charge the home owner with possession of the burglar's gun?
Maybe the homeowner turned it on the burglar by twisting the burglar's hand.
You know, like in the movies -
  • Grapple.
  • Twist.
  • ¡Bang!
  • Dramatic pause.
  • One guy slumps to the floor; the other guy, not so much.
If the homeowner never touched the gun itself,
they could only charge him with possession of burglary tools;
to wit: the burglar's hand.
 
Back
Top Bottom