If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
There's that "common sense" again.
"SB 719 is a common-sense bill that will empower families and law enforcement officers to take action to potentially prevent tragedies before they happen,” said Lisa Reynolds with Moms Demand Action in a statement. “That law will help save lives."
No lady, no it definitely will not.
It's odd how the left is worried that strict enforcement of immigration laws will cause people not to seek medical care because they're afraid they might get deported, but has no problem with signing a gun confiscation bill that is absolutely going to ensure that people will avoid mental health care because they're afraid that they will lose their 2A rights.
I think this is just one more step to another revolution or civil war. Because at some point, someone will order confiscation regardless of the 2nd Amendment.
Cool, it has to get worse before it can get better!
Maybe some fudds will get their guns taken away and wake some people up to protect their rights!
Of course it will, but it will be painfully convenient for the moonbats, because most of those people will suffer in silence until they shoot themselves or whatever, and it will never really be revealed that the shitty law had that kind of a "chilling effect" which likely DIRECTLY influenced that outcome...
Not to mention it does reveal what the left thinks all along, they basically think anyone who owns a gun that doesn't have a badge is a 110% piece of shit that isn't even worthy of mental health treatment. They will never admit it but that is obviously what they think, by this action.
-Mike
Just think about how this might change the sequence of events or the actions of a mentally unstable person in a crises when it becomes common knowledge what will happen to them under this law. This might actually accelerate / intensify bad situations.
Why do you hate children?
The government is quite consistent about generating the opposite results of what's intended. They don't care whom they harm, as long as their bureaucracy and control are expanded.
They will continue to react like the frog in warm water until it will be far to late to be an effective force against total confiscation.
It's time we started picking out redoubt locations...
No no no! You can't stand and defend a fixed position, it will only end in slaughter. Great if you want to go out in a blaze of glory and all, but guerrilla tactics are the more effective way to go when fighting a numerically and technologically superior enemy.
Ok, so what is the definition of "imminent risk"? Who decides what the threshold is?SB 719A, allows police, or a member of a subject’s family or household, to file a petition with the court which could lead to an order prohibiting firearms possession if it is believed they pose an imminent risk to themselves or others.
It's time we started picking out redoubt locations...
It's odd how the left is worried that strict enforcement of immigration laws will cause people not to seek medical care because they're afraid they might get deported, but has no problem with signing a gun confiscation bill that is absolutely going to ensure that people will avoid mental health care because they're afraid that they will lose their 2A rights.