If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
For some reason this old guy reminds me of Hickok... Probably the cargo shorts, tucked in loose t-shirt, and ball cap.
Who robs an internet cafe?
.Who robs an internet cafe?
Internet cafes are regulated by the state. They offer sweepstakes entries, which are used to buy time on computer terminals that simulate casino-style games. The operations, which have sprung up around the county and the state, are known to deal in cash.
“I was down, and I'm not going to continue to shoot you,” he said."
Who robs an internet cafe?
Conviction would be a near given if the state wanted it. Charge the person with a crime (mandatory 20 years in FL since the gun was discharge), offer a plea bargain, and let him decide if he wants to liquidate his retirement funds on the chance, however strong, he will win.
I don't think so, he was 4 years old in 1945. We gotta stop calling him the "old guy", or are that many of you under 30 out there?WWII Vet. Probably landed on Normandy Beach or fought with Patton and ain't afraid of some young dirtbag.
I don't think so, he was 4 years old in 1945. We gotta stop calling him the "old guy", or are that many of you under 30 out there?
How about the part at the end of the video where he is still shooting as they are running out the door and down the sidewalk?
I don't think so, he was 4 years old in 1945. We gotta stop calling him the "old guy", or are that many of you under 30 out there?
Most predators are pussies.
Remember that.
Yep, don't underestimate those old guys. They went through a lot of "stuff". Me, I turned 17 just about the time Kissinger was negotiating in Paris, so I missed the joys of Vietnam.Yep only 71. Late Korea, Early Vietnam. Same deal. Sat in a rice pattie up to his ass in water and leeches chewing on him or being eaten by misquotes in his hooch while he tried to get some sleep. Still no fear.
That doesn't pass my test for stopping an imminent threat.
that is the reason i carry 45ACP or at least S&W40 so BG would not be running away and i would not have to shoot them in the back
I love how he shot at the robbers, like a person spraying a cat/dog with a water bottle.
Is that a NH thing, shooting people who aren't threatening you? I didn't know.Friendly favor I ask... don't ever come to NH and vote.
Is that a NH thing, shooting people who aren't threatening you? I didn't know.
I consider armed robbery a threat too, and while they were in the shop brandishing weapons, they were fair game. I thought I made that clear. If they are running away like scared children, the threat has stopped, and self defense shooting is not justified (IMHO). Regarding your last statement, I don't consider myself in the role of judge and jury, and it's not up to me to enact retribution or revenge. Just protection. It's not up to me to set them straight.I would consider armed robbery as a threat. It would be nice if this didn't become another out yourself thread. The scumbags made the decision to attempt to rob a bunch of innocent people, it didn't work out for them. I have no issue that these two got shot during, or directly after threatening to harm or kill others. How about this for a thought.....Don't want to get shot? Don't f--king commit armed robbery.
How about the part at the end of the video where he is still shooting as they are running out the door and down the sidewalk?
I consider armed robbery a threat too, and while they were in the shop brandishing weapons, they were fair game. I thought I made that clear. If they are running away like scared children, the threat has stopped, and self defense shooting is not justified (IMHO). Regarding your last statement, I don't consider myself in the role of judge and jury, and it's not up to me to enact retribution or revenge. Just protection. It's not up to me to set them straight.
If that constitutes an outing, so be it.
I don't consider myself in the role of judge and jury, and it's not up to me to enact retribution or revenge. Just protection. It's not up to me to set them straight.
I did NOT say I thought he should be charged with anything. Don't put words in my mouth. The local sheriff said he was not going to charge him, and that's good enough for me. In looking at the video again, I think the shooter made a mistake in following the BGs, and firing at them through the door, but it's a close call about the threat. As I have stated earlier in this thread, we are only looking at videos, and I'll have to assume the shooter still felt there was a threat.So are you saying you would charge this man with some sort of crime? What kind of backwards ass justice do you support? Stevie Wonder would be able to clearly see who is in the wrong in this situation. In the heat of the moment the guy kept shooting while they were running away, BFD. As I said the scumbags are the ones that initiated the reaction. They are the only ones to blame. I'm so friggin sick of victims being blamed for the actions of scum. If these dirtbags didn't commit this crime the 71-year old guy may have happily gone to his grave without ever needing to use his carry piece for SD.
Someone should remind the scumbag that when you go to rob someone, Code Duello rules don't apply."Though Henderson said he doesn't blame Williams for shooting, he takes exception with Williams shooting at him while he was down."
The danger (at least for me) is the thinking that it's OK to shoot someone who is running away and no longer a threat. I can understand adrenaline in a fight situation, and mistakes can be made. But I have thought through many scenarios like this, and I would go in knowing ahead of time what my limits should be.
I would definitely not advise engaging a fleeing BG. I have reviewed the justifiable use of force laws for several states, and someone doing that risks a very long time behind bars. For me, I'm only interested in self defense, and I enjoy my freedom. Once the threat stops, the shooting stops.
I consider armed robbery a threat too, and while they were in the shop brandishing weapons, they were fair game. I thought I made that clear. If they are running away like scared children, the threat has stopped, and self defense shooting is not justified (IMHO). Regarding your last statement, I don't consider myself in the role of judge and jury, and it's not up to me to enact retribution or revenge. Just protection. It's not up to me to set them straight.
If that constitutes an outing, so be it.