• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Non Resident LTC

I understand your reasoning. Another issue is that it can be very hard to determine whether a particular mag is preban or not. Witness the Glock preban magazine thread here...
 
IANAL, but this is my understanding...

That Glock mag is dated "9/13/94" not because it was manufactured ON 9/13/94, but because federal law required such markings during the ban...

1. Glock mags are generally not marked with a date.
2. Federal law required that any "large capacity" magazine manufactured between 9/14/94 and 9/13/04 be marked to indicate "post-ban" manufacture. One of the acceptable methods was by imprinting "9/13/94".
3. Based on #1 and #2, a Glock magazine with the date of "9/13/94" imprinted on it IS a post-ban magazine.
 
Kevlar said:
IANAL, but this is my understanding...

That Glock mag is dated "9/13/94" not because it was manufactured ON 9/13/94, but because federal law required such markings during the ban...

1. Glock mags are generally not marked with a date.
2. Federal law required that any "large capacity" magazine manufactured between 9/14/94 and 9/13/04 be marked to indicate "post-ban" manufacture. One of the acceptable methods was by imprinting "9/13/94".
3. Based on #1 and #2, a Glock magazine with the date of "9/13/94" imprinted on it IS a post-ban magazine.
Click to expand...
And is therefore illegal. But not because it was manufactured on 9/13/94 -- it wasn't.

And if you possess one of these, I strongly suggest that you either dispose of it or get it out of state pronto, as possession is a felony. And I would delete online posts that admit to possesses them.
 
that would be my understanding as well. I was also told that the G32 mags I got from "dealer to be un named" were preban, till I got pulled over only to find a cop who actually knows his sh*t about pre/post ban tell me they were not! How can a mag marked .357 sig be preban when the round wasn't invented till 97? I had no idea, and was lucky enough to have him let it slide! I immediately returned the mags to the dealer and explained, and he had no idea either.
 
This is exactly what I am trying to say...it could be pre or post...who wants to be the one that dishes out the cash to try and prove it for 60 bucks worth the mags...

I must say it is enjoyable to have a civil discussion on this matter...Its nice when everyone can understand each others points...
 
drgrant said:
CHSB or whatever they call themselves now is blowing hot and cold. Not long ago the word was that they would unrestrict after a year, or that they may have been game-able with a dog and pony show. Some of it might depend on how one constructs their "need" statement in their application. If you put a big dog and pony show in there, they might be less likely to hassle you.

For awhile they were also just lying to people, too... would go something like this:

Applicant: "So is my license going to be issued unrestricted?"
Smarmy state douche guy: " There shouldn't be any problem. "

(much time passes, guy gets envelope with license in it)

Applicant: "That f**king weasel lied to me- it says Hunting and Target on it. "


-Mike
Click to expand...

This is what happened to me. The guy told me that since I previously had an unrestricted MA LTC-A they would just treat it as a renewal and I should be fine. When I finally got it in the mail = Restrictions: Sporting.... WTF... So I'll reapply next year and see what happens.. but if it come back restricted again, I probably wont renew the following year.
 

Similar threads

LTC PD Boston 😔
Replies
8
Views
260
M1911
M1911
St. Louis Apartment Resident Shoots Alleged Naked Intruder
Replies
3
Views
116
ralphs
R
LTC Turnaround Woburn?
Replies
1
Views
170
2-4-5 Trioxin
2-4-5 Trioxin
Expiring medical marijuana card and obtaining LTC
2 3
Replies
70
Views
1K
CR2001
C
MA Out of state LTC
Replies
19
Views
359
drgrant
drgrant
Back
Top Bottom