Back in September, the NH House voted to ask the NH Supreme Court if:
"Would holding a session of the New Hampshire House of
Representatives remotely, either wholly or in part, whereby a quorum could
be determined electronically, violate Part II, Article 20 of the New
Hampshire Constitution?"
While the idea and convenience of remote sessions sounds appealing, forcing legislators to face the citizens at the State House has always proved valuable to protecting our rights. Those pushing for this chance do not want to face the public when they pass their draconian laws. If they are able to go to online only, they will never need to show up when we turn out lots of gun owners opposing their actions.
The docket for the House request is here for those who want to dig into the details: If there are any attorneys that want to help volunteer their time, please PM me.
NHFC has filed a motion opposing this change.
"Would holding a session of the New Hampshire House of
Representatives remotely, either wholly or in part, whereby a quorum could
be determined electronically, violate Part II, Article 20 of the New
Hampshire Constitution?"
While the idea and convenience of remote sessions sounds appealing, forcing legislators to face the citizens at the State House has always proved valuable to protecting our rights. Those pushing for this chance do not want to face the public when they pass their draconian laws. If they are able to go to online only, they will never need to show up when we turn out lots of gun owners opposing their actions.
The docket for the House request is here for those who want to dig into the details: If there are any attorneys that want to help volunteer their time, please PM me.
Frequently Requested Cases
Each year several cases receive significant public scrutiny. We have gathered the relevant documents for each one here.
www.courts.state.nh.us
NHFC has filed a motion opposing this change.