There is a red flag type bill: (HB696, link below) that under the guise of 'protecting the elderly' will authorize things like:
II. If the court makes a specific finding that it necessary for the protection of the plaintiff, the court may prohibit the defendant from purchasing, receiving, or possessing any deadly weapons and any and all firearms and ammunition for the duration of the order. The court may subsequently issue a search warrant authorizing a peace officer to seize any deadly weapons specified in the protective order and any and all firearms and ammunition, if there is probable cause to believe such firearms and ammunition and specified deadly weapons are kept on the premises or curtilage of the defendant.
Why aren't all of the gun groups fighting this? If someone sees a post by a group, please post a copy. I know that GOA and NHFC have drafted letters and emails against this. So has GONH on FB.
Why are the others MIA?
http://gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/billtext.aspx?sy=2019&txtFormat=amend&id=2019-0395H
II. If the court makes a specific finding that it necessary for the protection of the plaintiff, the court may prohibit the defendant from purchasing, receiving, or possessing any deadly weapons and any and all firearms and ammunition for the duration of the order. The court may subsequently issue a search warrant authorizing a peace officer to seize any deadly weapons specified in the protective order and any and all firearms and ammunition, if there is probable cause to believe such firearms and ammunition and specified deadly weapons are kept on the premises or curtilage of the defendant.
Why aren't all of the gun groups fighting this? If someone sees a post by a group, please post a copy. I know that GOA and NHFC have drafted letters and emails against this. So has GONH on FB.
Why are the others MIA?
http://gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/billtext.aspx?sy=2019&txtFormat=amend&id=2019-0395H