-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
NH Anti-gun bills in the Senate...
- Thread starter design
- Start date
Any source for a visual "diff" between the house and senate versions, e.g. for HB109?
For those of us temporarily stuck with Democrat reps (who will never vote against these bills), it'd be nice to know if there's anything that can be brought up to them in relation to reconciling the house and senate versions.
MassPete
NES Member
Sen. Robert Guida, R-Warren, said restricting guns on school property will make students less safe.
“We would be much better to put a sign on the school that says staff are trained in the use of deadly force,” Giuda said.
“We would be much better to put a sign on the school that says staff are trained in the use of deadly force,” Giuda said.
KBCraig
NES Member
Legiscan sucks, and I wish people would stop relying on it. It causes them to post all sorts of outdated and irrelevant stuff.
Whutmeworry
NES Member
Anybody hear anything about a Sununu veto on these yet??
Bills need to go back to the House to either Concur, Non-Concur or ask for a Committee of Conference (CoC)
We need to ask our reps to Roll Call those motions.
Donate to the NHGOP, forward to your state Rep. a copy of the receipt of the donation to the Republican party and thank your rep profusely for their assistance in getting you to involved in politics and financially supporting a party that cares about the 2nd amendment. If you were an independent, let them know that in the same email, if this was your first political donation, let them know that as well.
MassPete
NES Member
After watching that video, It sure looks like it...
SpaceCritter
NES Member
Well, we can only hope that those who voted Donk cuz pissed at Trump or whatever, or stayed home for same, look at what the General Court has been up to and says, "Holy shit - what have we done?"
It'll be up to the NHGOP to communicate the correct message to cause that moment of enlightenment, so people are less inclined to repeat the mistake.
It'll be up to the NHGOP to communicate the correct message to cause that moment of enlightenment, so people are less inclined to repeat the mistake.
ChevyGuy91
NES Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 22,916
- Likes
- 23,495
I will say they seem to be working a bit harder/better this year, time will tell. I do feel better then Sununununununu decided not to run for higher office.
No matter how bad it gets here, NH will never be anywhere even close to the ass hattery of MA. EVER!
The question is, will both move in the direction of further asshattery? No question NH will remain far behind MA in that department, but that doesn't mean the directionality will be good.
They passed a bill a few years ago in NH (and Sununu signed it) that says if you think you're a little boy who thinks you're a girl, your psychiatrist isn't allowed to try to work it out. He just has to "affirm" it. They passed that bill before MA did, with little fanfare or outrage.
I wouldn't go jinxing things.
Even Ma, wasn't Ma. in my lifetime.
If you told me 40 years ago we would be where we are now I would have laughed in your face.
Less cocky and more fighting to kick these asshats out of your state unless you want to be right where we are now .
DispositionMatrix
NES Member
40 years ago MA was not even 3 years past voting down a total ban on handgun ownership, complete with confiscation.
David Kopel
Also:
How do you think such a ballot initiative in MA would go today and how would LEO attitudes toward firearm ownership stack up?
KBCraig
NES Member
It does. With the exception of veto overrides, no action can be taken in the House unless it's posted in the Calendar.
Here's the Friday calendar for next week.
http://gencourt.state.nh.us/house/caljourns/calendars/2019/HC_27.pdf
HB 109-FN, requiring background checks for commercial firearms sales.
That has to be one of the most dishonest titles. The real title should be that they are redefining non commercial sales and forcing them to have background checks.
That has to be one of the most dishonest titles. The real title should be that they are redefining non commercial sales and forcing them to have background checks.
strangenh
NES Member
Almost every anti-gun bill seems to come with a dishonest title, but you're right - that one is blatantly not what it says it is. It is also a terribly worded mess that also eliminates the automatic proceed from a delay past the statutory maximum (i.e., a delay becomes a permanent denial without actually having to issue a denial).
I can tell you for a fact that outside of Boston no one gave a crap.
We walked down the sidewalk with our .22s to go shoot rats at the dump ZFG .
We had gun racks in the back windows of our pickups ZFG.
We would sit on the back deck and shoot ZFG.
I was bringing my shotgun on the school bus in the mid 70's to go hunt out behind the school ZFG.
The cancer spread outward from what MA. liberals consider the center of the universe (Boston)
If we knew then what we know now we should have driven every moonbat out of our towns on a rail tarred and feathered.
SpaceCritter
NES Member
Thing is, those "hubs" rely on resources from those suburban and rural areas - things that come to them over tenuous lines of logistics: goods (food, clothing, building materials), electricity, ...
KBCraig
NES Member
And I think the founders were keenly aware of the this fact/tendency. I know the electoral college was drafted to address presidential elections, but the idea and principle is directly related to what you are talking about here. The founders knew we would have a problem with this. This problem pops up on the state level over and over again all over the country with regard legislation. It is democracy of the mob, which is tyranny.
