How in the world did F&G ever get a pass on the 4th amendment to begin with?
Good question!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
How in the world did F&G ever get a pass on the 4th amendment to begin with?
We don't have the expensive bags here, but we do have segregated recycling at the town transfer station (glass/metal/plastic and then "waste"). When the transfer station shuttered for several weeks in early 2020, a lot of people, myself included, started to burn more.I say the underlined while I'm seriously considering a burn barrel for trash once I move north and have to buy fancy bags for the trash. Make things hard or expensive to dispose of and you have less than environmentally friendly solutions.
326 nowGOA put out a link. I've had 325 emails from all over the country about 1091, every one of them identical except for the name.
They're not helping when they do that.
Yeah, the reusable bags are nasty, not all of them are even able to be washed easily, and contribute to gray water waste which sucks for people with septic systems just barely hanging on.
I do think exploring ways of reducing our waste stream is useful-even just our little portion, but I don't think any of the 2022 bills are the right way to do that.
I say the underlined while I'm seriously considering a burn barrel for trash once I move north and have to buy fancy bags for the trash. Make things hard or expensive to dispose of and you have less than environmentally friendly solutions.
NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW NOW PROHIBITS BACKYARD TRASH BURNING! On July 16, 2001 a statute (RSA-125N) was signed in to law that prohibits the “residential open burning of combustible domestic waste”. This ban on “backyard trash burning” is effective January 1, 2003.
Well it's a good thing I burn trash in my front yard.NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW NOW PROHIBITS BACKYARD TRASH BURNING! On July 16, 2001 a statute (RSA-125N) was signed in to law that prohibits the “residential open burning of combustible domestic waste”. This ban on “backyard trash burning” is effective January 1, 2003.
Not at all.So, they should up the game with an algorythm that changes the Subject and Content just enough to appear different while supporting/opposing the overall bill?
I bet I could make some money coding that
The courts let them. Just like Terry stops, and immigration checkpoints, and sobriety checkpoints.How in the world did F&G ever get a pass on the 4th amendment to begin with?
The courts didn’t write the law as original.The courts let them. Just like Terry stops, and immigration checkpoints, and sobriety checkpoints.
"Becuz muh exigency!"
That is quite useful.As a reminder, you can also remotely register your support for bills. Get on it.
Click on calendar.
Click the F&G committee.
Note date and time and bill number. Click remote sign in.
Date, drop down for the bill, member of public, myself, I support, then continue through the prompts. It is not anonymous.
End result:
Thanks for the protip!As a reminder, you can also remotely register your support for bills. Get on it.
Click on calendar.
Click the F&G committee.
Note date and time and bill number. Click remote sign in.
Date, drop down for the bill, member of public, myself, I support, then continue through the prompts. It is not anonymous.
End result:
True, but the courts created the concept, which was then written into law.The courts didn’t write the law as original.
Is it likely to get added? Or is there potential inside baseball to keep it original?There is an amendment to 1091, which we'll discuss during the Friday hearing.
I did an a/b comparison to the original bill, and I don't think I care for the amendment. It makes changes suggested by the department--changes that effectively neuter the bill by adding RAS back in as a catch-all excuse.
The original point of the bill was to remove RAS, and add the higher standard of Probable Cause.
Committee voted to recommend Intermediate Study on HB1091. At first I wasn't going to support IS, but I followed the lead of prime sponsor Jim Spillane. If the IS hadn't passed, the next motion would have been ITL.
Nothing's final until the House as a whole votes on it. I'll be speaking with others about how to revive it.
I don't normally speak up during committee discussion, but I did so today. Everyone else was so in love with letting police do whatever they want, that I decided I had to say something.
This should be time-stamped to start at 3:00:51, if you care to hear my dulcet tones.
View: https://youtu.be/-JbQ-7NpeNg?t=10851
If anyone is unclear on that,... guess what the second or third order effects of making it difficult or expensive to dispose of trash is.
Done, does this also link to a video feed once started?Several gun bills up in the House's Criminal Justice and Public Safety Commitee today. You can use the "remote sign in" this morning to support of oppose.
View attachment 569364
Done, does this also link to a video feed once started?
State Sen. Regina Birdsell has filed legislation that would amend the New Hampshire Constitution to ensure that only citizens of the United States and citizens of New Hampshire can vote in our state’s elections. This legislation, referred to as Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution (CACR) 36, would simply replace the present language in the New Hampshire Constitution that says state “inhabitants” can vote in our elections. Instead, it would read:
“All elections are to be free, and every person who is a citizen of the United States and a citizen of the state of New Hampshire, and 18 years of age and upwards shall have an equal right to vote in any election. Every person shall be considered a citizen of the state of New Hampshire for the purposes of voting in a town, ward, or unincorporated place where that person is domiciled and has primary residency.” CACR 36
Looks like the senate committees don’t use the link and you just have to email the members.