New Executive Orders on Guns looming...

i Really hope he tried some serious shit... The more polarizing he becomes the better. No more boiling-the-frog crap, just to full retard.
 
It's like the kid that just got his ass kicked walking away. He keeps looking over his shoulder saying "I'll be back mother f$$$er!" You gonna be sorry!

Exactly.... Last State of the Union address he said that victims of Sandy Hook, Aurora, etc "deserved a vote.".

Well they got their vote.....

Unfortunately the vote didn't go the way he wanted it to so now everyone that didn't vote for it or voiced opposition to is an immoral, NRA liars that are ignoring the wishes of a fictitious 90% of the citizenry using legislative tricks.

You lost!!! No shutup and go fix the budget, deficit, taxes, and too big to fail......
 
e5e3uje6.jpg


HAHAHA..... Classic!
 
I think he is acting like a spoiled child that can't get his way. After listening to his speech yesterday, it is becoming obvious to the most casual observer that this is the case. Add to that the I don't believe he know what compromise is, that his idea of a conversation is "Give me what I want, right now". It is all adding up. This despicable human being has never grown up. He is so used to getting whatever he wants that he cannot deal with it when he doesn't.

This.
 
Deval proposed very little in his legislation. The biggest piece is that he is proposing to limit 1 gun purchase per month. He also has some mumbo jumbo on mental health, but he's not pushing to ban assault weapons or further reduce magazine size since that worked so well in NY.

Complete fail. Have you even read his legislation?

Also, you are aware of the litany of other gun control bills that we are facing right now right? Thirdly, I would not be surprised if MA adopted the "1-feature AWB" bill (same one NY, CT, and MD have already passed) in order to ram it through some emergency session or some bullcrap like that.
 
Last edited:
And that 1 gun a month thing is worse than that:


No person licensed under section 122 shall sell, rent or lease, to another person, other than to an
exempt person under subsection (c) of section 131E, more than 1 rifle, shotgun, firearm, machine
gun, large capacity weapon or large capacity feeding device in any 30-day period.

rent?? so would that mean you couldn't go to a place like American Firearms School 2x in a month and rent a few different guns to try?

sorry if this is a dumb question.
 
THe bill can be brought back AT ANY TIME for reconcideration, that is why Reid voted against it....so he can try and gin up votes.\

You can count on Reid bringing it back to the floor at 3am on a sat morning on a holiday weekend with barely a quorum

Reid plays to win....he's crafty and relentless

I wish McConnell and Boehner would start taking notes........
 
This just from the White House
 

Attachments

  • 550299_517062545017683_489133921_n.jpg
    550299_517062545017683_489133921_n.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 109
You can count on Reid bringing it back to the floor at 3am on a sat morning on a holiday weekend with barely a quorum

Reid plays to win....he's crafty and relentless

I wish McConnell and Boehner would start taking notes........

Shit like that shouldn't be allowed
 
i Really hope he tried some serious shit... The more polarizing he becomes the better. No more boiling-the-frog crap, just to full retard.


Agreed, just go all out already. It's already obvious what his intentions are. F*** it let's get this shit started already, FORWARD!!!
 
The dems are so full of shit. If I hear "90%" bs one more time... What do they not understand about people who have already been cleared for a gun license transacting freely between themselves.

WAY TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT. LYING, THIEVING, GOVERNMENT. GET MAD.

Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither.
 
We can speculate all we want but the one thing that Obama has showed is consistently is his desire to tax things. It's become somewhat of a punch like but truly, he taxes everything he can. So what I realistically expect is an overall price increase in most things related to the shooting sports, notably of course guns and ammo, perhaps even the raw materials. That's the one thing that fits his far left agenda. Tax people to the degree that they can do little else but rely on the government. It of course doesn't bother his billionaire liberal buddies. He's far less a socialist and more of a fascist dictator. Like others have said, his idea of compromise is everyone doing what he wants.

Still waiting on that budget....

Only Congress has the right to levy taxes. Obama can propose anything he wants. But it has to get through the house. The budget originates in the House of Representatives.
 
You can count on Reid bringing it back to the floor at 3am on a sat morning on a holiday weekend with barely a quorum

Reid plays to win....he's crafty and relentless

I wish McConnell and Boehner would start taking notes........

You could count on Reid doing that if his heart was really in this.

He is walking a very fine line. He is a Dem in a very pro-gun state. So he has to balance his desire to curry favor with dems and also with his constituents.
He brings home the bacon and Nevada is socially a little left of center. But he can't appear like he is going to the mat on this or he will lose his job.

He got Obama stimulus money to finish this place:

http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/depts/parks/Pages/clark-county-shooting-park.aspx

I would give my right nut to have a state run shooting range like this available for my use for $7 per day.

Trap, skeet, handguns. 500 yard rifle , etc. Big harry brought that home to the people of LV.

Don
 
Last edited:
And that 1 gun a month thing is worse than that:


No person licensed under section 122 shall sell, rent or lease, to another person, other than to an
exempt person under subsection (c) of section 131E, more than 1 rifle, shotgun, firearm, machine
gun, large capacity weapon or large capacity feeding device in any 30-day period.


rent?? so would that mean you couldn't go to a place like American Firearms School 2x in a month and rent a few different guns to try?

sorry if this is a dumb question.

The real key words here are "No person licensed under section 122".
See, it only applies to the law abiding.
Criminals will continue to ignore these new laws as they do all the other laws on the books.
 
He cannot do bleep by EO. If he could, he would have already done it.

This.

Obama can only do so much through EO, and while anything he does is sure to chip away at our rights, I don't expect it's going to be anything profound. The president can't write and enact new legislation, only tweak existing legislation. I guess he could, for example, try to ban sale of 'assault' weapons by placing such a decree under the umbrella of some current law. There is a lot of ambiguity in the scope of EO's, so he could be pretty creative I suppose.

We'll see.
 
We can speculate all we want but the one thing that Obama has showed is consistently is his desire to tax things. It's become somewhat of a punch like but truly, he taxes everything he can. So what I realistically expect is an overall price increase in most things related to the shooting sports, notably of course guns and ammo, perhaps even the raw materials. That's the one thing that fits his far left agenda. Tax people to the degree that they can do little else but rely on the government. It of course doesn't bother his billionaire liberal buddies. He's far less a socialist and more of a fascist dictator. Like others have said, his idea of compromise is everyone doing what he wants.

Still waiting on that budget....

You hit the nail right on the ... Budget , oh that thing . Come Sept. they'll be kicking that can again . There's always much more
pressing issues.
 
Obama has decided he can execute American citizens without them being convicted in a court of law so nothing he tries will surprise me.
 
How about an executive order telling the police to round up known gang members and put them in jail for 20 years?
That would actually make a big difference in the violent crime rate.

But some of them might look like Obama's son, if he had one. So that wouldn't work.

I'm calling you out as a racist for this comment. But please, do enlighten us as to what you meant. I'm not one to be easily offended, but what exactly do you mean here? Or are you just ranting and raving?

First you want police to act like thugs and posse up and arrest people who the police assume to have gang affiliations. Then you remark that an Executive Order wouldn't work anyways "because some of these gang members might 'Look like Obama's son?'"

I mean seriously, aren't you just a racist bigot?
 
Last edited:
I'm calling you out as a racist for this comment. But please, do enlighten us as to what you meant. I'm not one to be easily offended, but what exactly do you mean here? Or are you just ranting and raving?

First you want police to act like thugs and posse up and arrest people who the police assume to have gang affiliations. Then you remark that an Executive Order wouldn't work anyways "because some of these gang members might 'Look like Obama's son?'"

I mean seriously, aren't you just a racist bigot?

15128d1343514479-you-kidding-me-lighten-up-anyone-touches-my-stuff-i-ll-kill-you-demotivational-poster-1253664846.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom