• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

My story.....Rhode Island traffic stop.....1 am

I've gotta say... this story does not pass the stink test IMHO.

Me thinks that the OP may not be telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Me thinks there's been some fabrication.

It just does not add up IMHO.

And to the OP, sorry if this offends you. But I call'em like I see'em.

Best,

Rich
 
yup ,when I,m carrying in a state where i have no license,and i'm 3 sheets to the wind, i be sure to drive my black suburban with the headlights on strobe[rofl]
 
No I do not consent to a search as he is cuffed and standing in the cold while the cops who are on the clock sit in their warm cruiser drinking coffee while waiting for a search warrant that may or may not come in the next 6 hrs.
Let's start with calling this a big screw up with a happy ending and an education as opposed to a cold shower after a strip search and a stale sandwich
Dave

You need probable cause for a warrant. Speeding and refusing consent are not PC in any state.
 
Refusing to provide a driver license in MA is arrestable misdemeanor. You actually acknowledge that when you sign for your license. If people ever read the fine print it would blow their mind as to what they consent to

Reminds me of a funny story. Back when I was on active duty we were doing some training one day that involved checking out a bunch of humvees from the motorpool. Checking out a humvee involved filling out a vehicle inspection checklist and a signing a bunch of forms. Well, the battalion career planner (recruiter for people that are already enlisted) had gotten together with the master sergeant that ran the motorpool to play a little practical joke on us. He slipped re-enlistment paperwork in with the vehicle checkout forms, and a bunch of us pretty much ended up re-enlisting because no one ever reads any of the forms they sign when they check out a vehicle.
 
I've had plenty of people refuse to grant me consent to search their vehicles. Wanna know what happens? I don't search their vehicle, I don't find some worthless quarter ounce of skunk weed that I didn't even care about in the first place, I don't end up having to arrest them, and I don't have to do hours of paperwork. Seriously, I get paid whether you assert your rights or not, but if you do assert your rights I often have a lot less BS work to do. Most cops are a lot less vindictive than people here realize.

Supervisor: Why didn't you hook that guy up!!!!
Me: I stopped him. He refused consent. I let him go. I got Subway. Want some of my chips?
Supervisor: Subway's open this late?
Me: The one at the truck stop is.
Supervisor: Awesome, I'm starving. I'll catch you later.

^That conversation actually happened one night.

Yeah I think there is common misconception that cops will do whatever they want. It's simply not true. If Officer Joe Smith continually does illegal search and seizures, the courts notice. Judges do not tolerate it. His Chief, also, notices. Suspensions, station assignments, termination can come of it.

MA courts are weigh HEAVILY on defendants and their constitutional rights as they should
 
Last edited:
Reminds me of a funny story. Back when I was on active duty we were doing some training one day that involved checking out a bunch of humvees from the motorpool. Checking out a humvee involved filling out a vehicle inspection checklist and a signing a bunch of forms. Well, the battalion career planner (recruiter for people that are already enlisted) had gotten together with the master sergeant that ran the motorpool to play a little practical joke on us. He slipped re-enlistment paperwork in with the vehicle checkout forms, and a bunch of us pretty much ended up re-enlisting because no one ever reads any of the forms they sign when they check out a vehicle.

That's pretty funny. Going for that golden anchor award...
 
Don't ever consent to a search! They can only legally detain you for 20 minutes, you said you were out therefor 15 already. Also don't handle your gun at all when getting pulled over!
 
Don't ever consent to a search! They can only legally detain you for 20 minutes, you said you were out therefor 15 already. Also don't handle your gun at all when getting pulled over!

Do you have a cite for that? I'm not saying you're wrong, but I know for a fact that we have no time limit whatsoever.
 
Quit beating up on the guy.

When you do dumb things like that, you deserve to get beaten up.

That was the dumbest thing I have ever heard of anyone doing. Carrying a concealed or loaded weapon in the cabin of a vehicle in a state where you are not licensed and either not a.) bothering to know the law or b.) know it and disregarding it?

Those cops were going off shift and not interested in booking your ass.
 
Do you have a cite for that? I'm not saying you're wrong, but I know for a fact that we have no time limit whatsoever.

There is case law in some states and maybe the feds too where the length of the stop can turn it into a seizure. I am betting this is the source of his statement but I don't know of anything specifying 20 minutes.
 
Last edited:
There is case law in some states and maybe the feds too where the length of the stop can turn it into a seizure. I am betting this is the source of his statement but I don't know of anything specifying 20 minutes.

There is no bright-line defining what is unreasonable. One court held that a 90 minute wait for the drug sniffing dogs to arrive was too long, but they would not say where that line was.

Another note: In Massachusetts, the police cannot issue an exit order based solely on a traffic stop. They must articulate some reason they were unsafe or uneasy. Many other states (maybe all - I don't know), the police can order you out of the car simply because they have stopped you for a traffic violation.
 
I'd consider changing/deleting a few facts and/or numbers. If someone with the ability to do so were to decide that these cops deserved to be bent over for not prosecuting a firearms violations, a little research coupled with those details might make it easier for them to do so. They were extremely cool considering how things have been where firearms are concerned. Give them a buffer.
 
There is case law in some states and maybe the feds too where the length of the stop can turn it into a seizure. I am betting this is the source of his statement but I don't know of anything specifying 20 minutes.

I don't have the cites at hand, but I believe that federal case law (different cases) holds that 20 minutes is reasonable to make someone wait, and 90 minutes is excessive. For a warrant, for a dog, whatever. Other than that, they can only hold a driver for the length of time it reasonably takes to deal with the reason for the stop, or any new issues that develop as a result of the stop.
 
Every officer is like him? No, of course not.

As I think back to the times I've been stopped:

1976, suburban Chicago area, peeled out at a traffic light, the cop yelled and screamed at me, no ticket. I deserved the yelling as I was driving like an idiot.
1977, suburban Chicago area, 10 over in a 35, 15 over in a school zone. The officer was very polite, told me to slow it down, no ticket.
1977, suburban Chicago area, 19 over in a 20 zone (not a school zone), got a ticket. The officer was very professional and very polite.
1978, Chicago, turning left at a no left turn sign, got a ticket. The officer was a bit terse, but professional, didn't yell at me in any way.
1980, West Virginia highway patrol, 69 in a 55, got a ticket. Trooper was very professional and polite.
~1995, Mass State Trooper, burned out headlight, got a warning. Trooper was very professional and polite.
~2005, suburban Boston area, 40 in a 25, got a warning. Officer was very professional and polite.

Yes, some cops have bad days. Some just suck no matter what. Yes, if you are polite and show respect you are more likely to get the same back.

But being polite and showing respect doesn't mean you have to consent to a search. Yes, they may still search regardless, but if you didn't consent then your lawyer has a chance to argue that the search was illegal; consent and you've taken away your lawyer's ammunition.

I agree with everything you are saying here in general, but question this last part. If he did not consent, then they searched anyway, let's say because they deemed him "jumpy and nervous" so they suspected cocaine or something which gave them probable cause for a search, are you saying that the lawyer could get the evidence tossed (gun), and he would get it back with no charges? I would find this very hard to believe if it went down like I described since they would have met the requirement of probable cause for a legal search.
 
I agree with everything you are saying here in general, but question this last part. If he did not consent, then they searched anyway, let's say because they deemed him "jumpy and nervous" so they suspected cocaine or something which gave them probable cause for a search, are you saying that the lawyer could get the evidence tossed (gun), and he would get it back with no charges? I would find this very hard to believe if it went down like I described since they would have met the requirement of probable cause for a legal search.

First, the lawyer has a chance if you don't consent. How good of a chance? I'm not a lawyer, I don't know. I have a hard time believing that someone being nervous is probable cause for a search. Everyone is nervous when they get stopped by a cop, but that doesn't mean that every cop has probable cause to search.
 
First, the lawyer has a chance if you don't consent. How good of a chance? I'm not a lawyer, I don't know. I have a hard time believing that someone being nervous is probable cause for a search. Everyone is nervous when they get stopped by a cop, but that doesn't mean that every cop has probable cause to search.

I get what you are saying, but I would definitely worry about gun charge even if they questioned the validity of the search at that point. Even if they did toss it on insufficient grounds, would he automatically get his gun returned to him at that point?
 
I don't have the cites at hand, but I believe that federal case law (different cases) holds that 20 minutes is reasonable to make someone wait, and 90 minutes is excessive. For a warrant, for a dog, whatever. Other than that, they can only hold a driver for the length of time it reasonably takes to deal with the reason for the stop, or any new issues that develop as a result of the stop.

I'm unfamiliar with that case law, and would be very interested in reading it if you can find it. Otherwise, that's exactly what I have been taught. Due diligence is the name of the game. I can't take one minute longer than necessary to complete my investigation. Put another way, though, I am permitted to take as long as necessary to complete my investigation, but not one minute longer. The lawyer that taught us at the academy provided the following example. If you're on a traffic stop and it takes 6 hours for a K9 to show up because they were all tied up with a search and rescue operation, that is not an unlawful detention. If it takes 10 minutes for a K9 to show up because the K9 agent stopped at Circle K for a coffee on the way over and there was a line, that is an unlawful detention.
 
Can't they order you to exit in order to perform a field sobriety test?

S/he must have reason to believe you're impaired. S/he usually makes that determination while you're fumbling for your license and registration. Also, you do not have to perform field sobriety tests. Again, this is Massachusetts law. I don't know about other states. I understand in California, they'll strap you down and take your blood if you refuse. In Mass, they can't force you to take a breathalyzer, and they cannot mention in court that you refused. They WILL yank your license for refusing, but you may skate on the DUI.
 
A quick related question about locking the car on exit...

Police car pulls out of his hidey hole... Check my speed... "Uh, oh!" Check that seat belt is fastened, watch to see if he really wants me. He pulls in behind me, and I start preparing to be stopped. Pull my wallet out of my back pocket and lay it on my lap or beside me. Lights come on, signal and pull over at the widest part of the breakdown lane (not on the narrow bridge!). Reach over and open glove box, grab folder with registration, lay it on the passenger seat, lower window 1/2 way, lock the doors with the button. Hands at 10 & 2, he finishes running my plate and comes to the window.

So, if I don't want them to open the car without my consent, how do I get the window up as I exit the car? I can manually unlock the driver's door when I reach for the handle, and manually push the lock closed again as soon as I've cracked the door. If I turned off the car and dropped the keys into my pocket as soon as I lower the window, I can't close the window when I exit the car. If I close the window as I exit the car, the keys are still in the ignition. Some cars won't let you lock the doors with the keys in the ignition.

If the doors are locked and the window 1/2 way lowered, is the car a closed and locked container that could only be searched if I was arrested? I don't want to go through too many machinations while exiting the car that will cause the officer to say something like "Leave the keys in the car" or hold out his hands for the keys or to prevent me from putting them into my pocket. I'm betting that as I exit the car, he will take a step back so that he can't prevent me from closing the locked door.

I've got broad shoulders; I can take criticisms of my mental preparations! [grin]
 
S/he must have reason to believe you're impaired. S/he usually makes that determination while you're fumbling for your license and registration. Also, you do not have to perform field sobriety tests. Again, this is Massachusetts law. I don't know about other states. I understand in California, they'll strap you down and take your blood if you refuse. In Mass, they can't force you to take a breathalyzer, and they cannot mention in court that you refused. They WILL yank your license for refusing, but you may skate on the DUI.

Which you can have the judge reinstate your license


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom