• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

MTV's True Life focusing on gun owners this week.

I was just reading an article today about the likelihood that Nebraska would pass a concealed carry law this coming session, and some of the details of the law. It highlights something I've commented on before. Massachusetts, New York and the other states that adopted gun control laws decades ago all tended to do so in an effort to keep the "wrong people" from having guns, e.g. Blacks, Italians, Irish, etc. Because of this the all tended to implement concealed carry laws that allowed the "right people" to carry essentially everywhere. In contrast, a lot of other states either implemented gun control laws later on or had prohibited conceaed carry and allowed open carry everywhere going back to the mid 1800's. As a result, when the other states finally got around to allowing concealed carry, they were strongly influenced by the anti-gun hysteria that started in the 60's. In order to get their bills passed they had to prohibit carry in all sorts of places, e.g., churches, restaurants, parks, sporting events, concerts, etc. Rest assured that if Massachusetts ever had to start from scratch, our laws would prohibit carry in roughly 98% of the land area of the state. [roll]

Ken
 
I was just reading an article today about the likelihood that Nebraska would pass a concealed carry law this coming session, and some of the details of the law. It highlights something I've commented on before. Massachusetts, New York and the other states that adopted gun control laws decades ago all tended to do so in an effort to keep the "wrong people" from having guns, e.g. Blacks, Italians, Irish, etc. Because of this the all tended to implement concealed carry laws that allowed the "right people" to carry essentially everywhere. In contrast, a lot of other states either implemented gun control laws later on or had prohibited conceaed carry and allowed open carry everywhere going back to the mid 1800's. As a result, when the other states finally got around to allowing concealed carry, they were strongly influenced by the anti-gun hysteria that started in the 60's. In order to get their bills passed they had to prohibit carry in all sorts of places, e.g., churches, restaurants, parks, sporting events, concerts, etc. Rest assured that if Massachusetts ever had to start from scratch, our laws would prohibit carry in roughly 98% of the land area of the state. [roll]

Ken
 
KMaurer said:
Rest assured that if Massachusetts ever had to start from scratch, our laws would prohibit carry in roughly 98% of the land area of the state.

Not a chance, Ken. If MA had to start from scratch, they wouldn't pass any kind of concealed carry law at all. Couldn't you just hear the screaming coming from Cambridge and Boston? [roll]
 
KMaurer said:
Rest assured that if Massachusetts ever had to start from scratch, our laws would prohibit carry in roughly 98% of the land area of the state.

Not a chance, Ken. If MA had to start from scratch, they wouldn't pass any kind of concealed carry law at all. Couldn't you just hear the screaming coming from Cambridge and Boston? [roll]
 
KMaurer said:
Rest assured that if Massachusetts ever had to start from scratch, our laws would prohibit carry in roughly 98% of the land area of the state.

Not a chance, Ken. If MA had to start from scratch, they wouldn't pass any kind of concealed carry law at all. Couldn't you just hear the screaming coming from Cambridge and Boston? [roll]
 
Heck, if we could secede,we should do it now. [lol] Boston does nothing for us up here,but make our taxes higher, for crap we have no use of.
 
Heck, if we could secede,we should do it now. [lol] Boston does nothing for us up here,but make our taxes higher, for crap we have no use of.
 
Heck, if we could secede,we should do it now. [lol] Boston does nothing for us up here,but make our taxes higher, for crap we have no use of.
 
03roushs1 said:
... If she did in fact still have the handgun in her purse at the bar she was breaking the law. ....

Now, to combine this with a different thread, let's say she was an off-duty cop with a new law REQUIRING them to carry.

Which law wins?
 
03roushs1 said:
... If she did in fact still have the handgun in her purse at the bar she was breaking the law. ....

Now, to combine this with a different thread, let's say she was an off-duty cop with a new law REQUIRING them to carry.

Which law wins?
 
03roushs1 said:
... If she did in fact still have the handgun in her purse at the bar she was breaking the law. ....

Now, to combine this with a different thread, let's say she was an off-duty cop with a new law REQUIRING them to carry.

Which law wins?
 
MrsWildweasel said:
Heck, if we could secede,we should do it now. [lol] Boston does nothing for us up here,but make our taxes higher, for crap we have no use of.

Ummm, I like Boston for the quality of medical care available (we have the No. 1 joint replacement hospital in the US, maybe even the world, along with the top Hip replacement doctor in the US if not the world.)

Also, as far as MTv and Journalism, IMHO equating that crappy station with journalism is like saying Teddy is a staunch Pro-Gun senator.

As I said before, that station is nothing but a mouth piece for the very liberal left.
 
Back
Top Bottom