Rockrivr1
NES Member
This is one of the best laws ever written in regard to "Gun Free Zones".
Behold, the newly conceived language from HF 3051:
“A property owner or entity who prohibits the carrying of firearms by a person who is otherwise authorized to carry a firearm or who is not otherwise prohibited from carrying a firearm shall assume absolute custodial responsibility for the safety and defense of the unarmed person while the person is located on the owner’s or entity’s property that is posted with a sign prohibiting firearms.”
What that means is that if a property owner says “no guns allowed” to a patron, then any form of harm – physical or financial – that happens to that patron is on the property owner.
Bill would let gun permit holders sue if hurt in a store that bans them from legally carrying
Proposed bill: If person hurt while on a property that forbids lawfully carrying in the establishment – then the property owners/company can get sued.
www.lawenforcementtoday.com