• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Massachusetts map of LTC per 1000 Residents

Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
131
Likes
15
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
I am not sure if this has been posted before. It was created in 2010, and may represent 2009 data or earlier. But still interesting. It is an interactive map; with some clicking on the legend, you can get it to color all towns, darker being more per thousand.

http://ibm.co/PaYKFQ

- - - Updated - - -

It isn't clear from the description whether this includes LTC-B and FID cards.
 
No wrong counting - if the results are displayed in 'licenses per 1000 residents' as indicated. Towns with less than 1000 residents would simply be calculated to get to 'per 1000'...

For example a town with 2 residents - and one of them having a LTC would have the value: 500 per 1000 residents!
 
Gosnold has 253 out of 1000 ???

The entire population is only 75 people. [rolleyes]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gosnold,_Massachusetts


The whole thing is per thousand, so I guess they crunched the stats as if they had 1,000 people relative to the 75 they do have.

- - - Updated - - -

No wrong counting - if the results are displayed in 'licenses per 1000 residents' as indicated. Towns with less than 1000 residents would simply be calculated to get to 'per 1000'...

For example a town with 2 residents - and one of them having a LTC would have the value: 500 per 1000 residents!


Yes.
 
Odd thing I noticed.... The cities/towns that are generally considered more dangerous (lawrence, lowell, boston) all have pretty low numbers per thousand..... hrmmmm
 
Wow, this is interesting

Buried in the comments was this gem - Violent crimes vs. gun ownership in MA

http://ibm.co/Pim6bQ

Pretty clear that the towns with highest violent crime are low on gun ownership and vice versa.
 
Buried in the comments was this gem - Violent crimes vs. gun ownership in MA

http://ibm.co/Pim6bQ

Pretty clear that the towns with highest violent crime are low on gun ownership and vice versa.

But that's legal gun ownership, it only counts the people the authorities know are licensed.
In places like Lowell, Lynn, Chelsea, Lawrence, Roxbury, Mattapan, Brockton, Fitchburg, Springfield and Holyoke, I'm sure the number of unlicensed gun possessors is far greater than us licensed folk.
 
Odd thing I noticed.... The cities/towns that are generally considered more dangerous (lawrence, lowell, boston) all have pretty low numbers per thousand..... hrmmmm

Thats because many of the people that live in the high crime areas done need no steenkin license[thinking]
 
I am not sure if this has been posted before. It was created in 2010, and may represent 2009 data or earlier. But still interesting. It is an interactive map; with some clicking on the legend, you can get it to color all towns, darker being more per thousand.

http://ibm.co/PaYKFQ

- - - Updated - - -

It isn't clear from the description whether this includes LTC-B and FID cards.
Thanks for posting the link. It would be nice to see a more recent list with license breakdown for each town including LTC-A unrestricted.
 
An interesting stat that we will never see would be guns/1000, which would include all of the legally owned and all "street" guns. I'll bet that in the towns/cities that have a low number of permits per thousand would have the highest number of guns/1000. [hmmm]
 
WOW, Thanks for the post. Very interesting. Would love to see this with current data. I bet Obama election has caused numbers to have increased, and with new election cycle now in effect, causing even bigger increase lately.
 
Cause I'm sure there's rounding in there somewhere and a correction of +/- x amount. Could be 1280, could be 1300...

What does it mean to accurately know how many people live in a particular town? People move in and out, there are transients, homeless people, undocumented people. These are likely census figures which give "best count" at the moment the census was taken. It is the best there is.
 
What does it mean to accurately know how many people live in a particular town? People move in and out, there are transients, homeless people, undocumented people. These are likely census figures which give "best count" at the moment the census was taken. It is the best there is.

That's pretty much what I meant, 1289 is probably not the exact population of that town.
 
Odd thing I noticed.... The cities/towns that are generally considered more dangerous (lawrence, lowell, boston) all have pretty low numbers per thousand..... hrmmmm
Allowing people that directly derive a financial living off crime prevention to control the issuance of gun licenses is completely wrong.

This is like forcing people to get a real estate salesperson license to sell their own home and giving the local real estate brokerage the power to decide if you are suitable enough to sell your own home.
 
But that's legal gun ownership...

Buried in the comments was this gem - Violent crimes vs. gun ownership in MA

my graph is titled correctly--"Massachusetts gun licenses vs violent crimes by city or town"--not sure what you are reading

I'm getting a dead link.

it's working now.

http://www-958.ibm.com/software/dat...alizations/massachusetts-gun-licenses-vs-viol

original thread

http://www.northeastshooters.com/vb...pita-by-Town?p=1300073&viewfull=1#post1300073

I'd like to do some more of these--I have a few ideas, like city/town license restrictions vs. city/town demographics (race, income, etc.).

and yes, the point of the graph was to show that crime most often occurs in areas with the fewest gun licenses. What would improve the dataset would be to use an average over multiple years since I suspect some small towns have like ONE reportable crime every few years. Likewise, some sort of spacial modeling would help account for the places that are influenced from neighboring areas.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom