If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
More gun violence. I can't wait for Obama to call for disarming of police officers.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/28/us/puerto-rico-police-officers-killed/
I mean no disrespect to the victims, but what constitute a mass shooting these days? Is three dead a mass shooting?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Three shot is a mass shooting. They don't even have to die.
Interesting paradox....I'll bet Obummer ignores it
Three shot is a mass shooting. They don't even have to die.
FBI considers it when 4 or more are dead, not including shooter. However I have seen the antis consider one dead and anyone shot as a mass shooting. Which is interesting because I saw a twitter battle where one of the "mass shootings" cited was an individual that died of heart failure, and another that was shot yet some how that fit their narrative.
Depends on what definition you use.
The FBI used "four dead, excluding the shooter, in a public place, not gang or family related" for a long, long time.
But some jackhole on Reddit decided he wanted to single handedly change the definition so everything looked worse, and started using "four shot", and that led to the "more than one a day in gun crazed America" nonsense.
The FBI definition puts it at like 26 in the last seven years.
FBI considers it when 4 or more are dead, not including shooter. However I have seen the antis consider one dead and anyone shot as a mass shooting. Which is interesting because I saw a twitter battle where one of the "mass shootings" cited was an individual that died of heart failure, and another that was shot yet some how that fit their narrative.
Depends on what definition you use.
The FBI used "four dead, excluding the shooter, in a public place, not gang or family related" for a long, long time.
But some jackhole on Reddit decided he wanted to single handedly change the definition so everything looked worse, and started using "four shot", and that led to the "more than one a day in gun crazed America" nonsense.
The FBI definition puts it at like 26 in the last seven years.
He's in Hawaii playing golf, he's not going to care one bit.
In the state of the union address I bet we get double servings of gun control, climate change, all that BS. And since it's his last, he'll be patting himself on the back endlessly.
The historical number was the 4, it was always that. But that doesn't work for the anti's so now they use whatever. After the oregon shooting or San Bernardino all over the news and internet the anti's were hyping some crap about there have been 155 mass shootings this year (might have been 350, I forget but it was a crazy number) and people where shocked.
When the stats don't work for you, just make up a new absurd one.
The number of ‘mass shootings’ in the U.S. depends on how you count
Wednesday’s massacre in San Bernardino was the latest mass shooting in America. By some counts — including a heavily cited version — it was the 354th of the year. By a narrower definition, it was the 40th. In light of the headlines about mass shootings, there’s been a growing debate about what should count.
Definitions for statistics are far from perfect. We must assign numbers to complex events. We must group and categorize people and scenarios that are anything but generic. And we must be aware of the imperfections we place in data by making these decisions.
FBI considers it when 4 or more are dead, not including shooter. However I have seen the antis consider one dead and anyone shot as a mass shooting. Which is interesting because I saw a twitter battle where one of the "mass shootings" cited was an individual that died of heart failure, and another that was shot yet some how that fit their narrative.
FBI considers it when 4 or more are dead, not including shooter. However I have seen the antis consider one dead and anyone shot as a mass shooting. Which is interesting because I saw a twitter battle where one of the "mass shootings" cited was an individual that died of heart failure, and another that was shot yet some how that fit their narrative.