"Make my Day Law"

Admin

Staff Member
Administrator
Moderator
NES Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
43,696
Likes
47,115
Location
Monadnock area, NH
Feedback: 18 / 0 / 0
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/15/make.myday.ap/index.html

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (AP) -- A man accused of fatally shooting someone in a car has been acquitted of first-degree murder under a state law that provides legal protection to homeowners who defend themselves.

But a legislator says the 1985 law -- known as the "Make My Day" law -- may have been misinterpreted by the jury.

Gary Lee Hill, 24, faced charges in the 2004 killing of 19-year-old John David Knott, who along with three others had assaulted Hill in his home.

Hill was accused of firing a shot into a car that Knott was driving. Knott crashed into a house and died from a single gunshot wound to the back, authorities said.

"It's a miscarriage of justice," said Sen. Jim Brandon, who helped craft the law. The law meant a home's door to be a threshold for an illegal entry, not down the street, he said.

Prosecutor Lisa Kirkman said the law says deadly force can be used "if the shooter reasonably believes the other person might use physical force against the home dweller."

According to testimony, Knott and the others showed up at Hill's house after an argument over a missing purse.

"Gary went through this horrible and traumatic event," said defense attorney Ted McClintock. "They promised they were going to come back in. They had already come back once."

I agree with the shooting because of the last statement. I'm surprised the jury did too.
 
I have to disagree. I cannot advocate shooting someone who is fleeing. They have to have intent, means, and opportunity for you to employ deadly force.

Calling LE and making preparations for the future would have been the right call with what info I read.
 
Adam_MA said:
Or get into a advantageous location inside your house with plenty of ammo, and wait. [twisted]

That's my point. Unless he was driving towards the shooter and his house I call this a bad shoot. It would appear from the article (being shot in the back) this was not the case.
 
Back
Top Bottom