Look at Taxes This Way...

FPrice

Retired Zoomie
NES Life Member
NES Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
27,388
Likes
22,943
Location
Western Mass
Feedback: 104 / 0 / 0
What follows is the best way to describe the american tax system, and the cuts that have and should occur, as well as what truly happens now days.

TAXES
Lets put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten people go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh $7.
The eighth $12.
The ninth $18.
The tenth (the richest) would pay $59.
So, thats what they decided to do.
They ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a problem. "Since you are all such good customers," the owner said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."
So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four were unaffected, they would still eat for free.
What about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get their fair share?
The six paying customers realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33. If they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth and the sixth would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal.
So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each persons bill by roughly the same amount, and proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so:
The fifth, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. The first four continued to eat for free. Once outside the restaurant, they began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth, pointing to the tenth diner "but they got $10!"
"Yeah, that’s right," exclaimed the fifth. "I only saved a dollar, too. Its unfair that they got ten times more than me!"
"That’s true!!" shouted the seventh. "Why should they get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four in unison. "We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine surrounded and beat up the tenth diner.
The next night the tenth diner didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without number ten. When it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table any more. There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean.


Would hate to have all the "rich" people realize that they could afford a move to another country, wouldn't you?
 
If they want to serve up 18% I'll take it. Arlen Spector said 20% was the going rate last time it was brought up. Anything is better than 28. :x
 
A year or two back somebody did an estimate that the federal government could get by without any income tax. All it would have to do was just limit itself to the activities and programs that it's actually authorized to do under the Constitution and eliminate all the unconstitutional extras. If they insisted on their current level of illegal activity, the economic growth resulting from a lower, simpler flat tax system would provide the needed revenue with a 12% tax rate and an exemption on the first $15K per person in income. E.g., a four person family with an annual income under $60,000 wouldn't pay any tax, while one with $100,000 would pay $4,800 (12% of the additional $40K).

Ken
 
A year or two back somebody did an estimate that the federal government could get by without any income tax.

Yeah? What's the catch?

All it would have to do was just limit itself to the activities and programs that it's actually authorized to do under the Constitution and eliminate all the unconstitutional extras.

See, there's always a catch.
 
Back
Top Bottom