So I finally snuck out to the range to test out some lighter powder puff 44 mag loads that I plan to use for indoor/winter shooting since we can't shoot jacketed or magnum rounds indoors.
I'm using X-treme plated 240 gr RN bullets
5.8 gr 231
~1.610" COL
WLP Primers
Light crimp, just enough to keep the bullets from being pushed into the case by hand.
Using my Ruger Super Redhawk 7.5"
They shot extremely well at ~35 ft. The only thing that stood out to me was the unburnt powder in the cases and in the barrel. Is this typical when using faster burning powders like 231 in 44 mag?
Should I not really care since they shot very accurately? I haven't chronoed these yet but based on my Hornady manual using lead 240 gr data, these should be running between 800-850 fps.
I have other powders like Bullseye, Titegroup, and Power Pistol but I'd like to save those for my 9mm and 7.62x25 loads. Would those others powders burn better?
View attachment 127055
View attachment 127056
View attachment 127057
I'm using X-treme plated 240 gr RN bullets
5.8 gr 231
~1.610" COL
WLP Primers
Light crimp, just enough to keep the bullets from being pushed into the case by hand.
Using my Ruger Super Redhawk 7.5"
They shot extremely well at ~35 ft. The only thing that stood out to me was the unburnt powder in the cases and in the barrel. Is this typical when using faster burning powders like 231 in 44 mag?
Should I not really care since they shot very accurately? I haven't chronoed these yet but based on my Hornady manual using lead 240 gr data, these should be running between 800-850 fps.
I have other powders like Bullseye, Titegroup, and Power Pistol but I'd like to save those for my 9mm and 7.62x25 loads. Would those others powders burn better?
View attachment 127055
View attachment 127056
View attachment 127057
Last edited: