greencobra
NES Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Messages
- 27,199
- Likes
- 26,682
you guys would have nothing to say if they restricted the .40, would ya's now?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Sweet Federal Suit of Death, descend upon this libberal hellhole...I’m good friends with a certain high ranking long time official in the department who is retired. His former boss wasn’t even happy reissuing his LTC in Lexington.
How’s that for a suck pill?
Thanks for the intel.Three unrestricted Lexington LTC's in my family. Believe it or not, the former CLEO and his licensing officer were 2A friendly. But then this happened. Shortly thereafter, CLEO retires. And shortly after that, licensing officer retires. Have not heard how the new guys are treating applicants, but fear things have gotten worse.
Try this:
Inanopiniona decision by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court made clear that the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms” includes a broad right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense.
In Haverhill the last 2 licensing officers just type "all lawful purposes" into the block and don't even ask.Agree, "All lawful purposes" has been the standard answer to this question for as long as I have had an LTC (25 years)
GOAL has a page on the subject:
Which curiously does not mention "All lawful purposes."
Yes, and with GOAL's help it was effectively resisted. Watered down to an a meaningless resolution.Isn’t Lexington the town where a Town Meeting board member tried to ban all semi-automatic weapons with an amendment a few years back? Seems like the town has been going downhill for a while.
Yes it was: Town symbolically bans semi-automatic weapons
I guess its muzzleloaders only.