ChevyGuy91
NES Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 22,916
- Likes
- 23,496
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Justice Kavanaugh
- Thread starter rwl1955
- Start date
I heard anyone testifying on this will be under oath.
Bmcl322
NES Member
Ever notice that all these female "victims" are either Sociology or Psych. majors?
Often these people have issues to begin with and they take up these fields to figure out deep routed problems from within.
Often these people have issues to begin with and they take up these fields to figure out deep routed problems from within.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 3,744
- Likes
- 10,168
Yep, Grassely said that Kavanaugh signed documents that would send him to prison for five years if he is found to be lying. If I remember correctly the accusers are also required to sign those documents. This is the main reason they probably won't testify. They are shaky on the details and now their words have consequences.
Yes, and they are all exponentially crazier than the patients they see.....but having a suffix of Dr. or Phd gives them a pass in the eyes of the general public and their own inner circles.
namedpipes
NES Member
I haven't been mugged, but the others have happened to me. I'm also personally aware of numerous burglaries and home invasions in my community (beyond what is reported in the news). Interestingly, I haven't encountered anyone that has mentioned being mugged.
Not knowing something happened isn't the same as "it didn't happen".
I will agree with you in principle that "b*****s be crazy", but at the same time, they pretty much make life worth living, so there's that. And men aren't all that easy to live with either, so cut the ladies some slack...
namedpipes
NES Member
The Dems are leading us back to the Salem witch trials. Guilty until proven innocent,............... now that's progress
Progress is simply movement in a forward direction. Since their goal is socialism, then leading us back to the witch trials IS progress.
Glockster30
NES Member
You forgot about all the witnesses that didn't see anything.
The Dems are leading us back to the Salem witch trials. Guilty until proven innocent,............... now that's progress
Agree. Dennis Prager mentioned this very same thing on his program the other day, where during the Salem witch trials accused "witches" had to prove they were not witches rather than their accusers prove they were.
amm5061
NES Member
The Witch Trials have a special meaning for my family, since we're directly descended from one of the victims. I see almost no difference between this f***ing three ring circus and what happened in 1692.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 3,744
- Likes
- 10,168
Me too! Well, wife's family are decedents of the victims. I traced my family two years ago and found out that my ancestors were in Salem at the same time as her ancestors. I thought "How cool is that! They might have known each other, gone to the same church, etc." I looked up my ancestor and found that he testified in court in defense of the Proctors. Kinda weird since my wife and I were born and raised 1400 miles apart but found each other.
My wife has her Masters in Somatic Psych and her sister has her Ph.D. in Clinical Psych. The vast majority of people in both their programs were pursuing the field because the had their own massive issues they were trying to sort out.
Nick Fury
NES Member
Yep. My own personal experience matches this assessment.
commodon
NES Member
Absolutely!! We've got nothing to lose and everything to gain...
Seems like 4Chan might have cornered Avenetti:
Michael Avenatti Locks Twitter, Admits Kavanaugh Accuser Might Not Appear
I was a Psych major when I first went to college. Your observation - combined with the fact that I would have had to stay in school to get a Masters and then a Ph.D. to do anything substantial in the field - is why I dumped the major.
The Dems are leading us back to the Salem witch trials. Guilty until proven innocent,............... now that's progress
Again - exactly why I keep bringing up the feminism angle. Feminists have been yelling about that "all men are guilty!" thing for quite some time. It's nothing more than an entire movement - looking for a witch hunt.
Thats because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO SEE.
And both fields try to impose THEIR "solution seeking" on others.....and get paid to do so. Its all a fvcking sham from the word go.
goodzilla
NES Member
The craziest women I've met have been those enamored by psychology or chosen it as a profession. I'm sure it's not true of all, but it's been my experience.
goodzilla
NES Member
Bingo, lol, I just said something similar.
I'm skeptical of anyone whose life revolves around the actions, feelings, and motivations of other people. They are the quintessential "second handers" who Ms. Rand's Ellsworth Toohey embodied in The Fountainhead.
Shark_Cage
NES Member
There is a famous feminist professor at BC who says that all hereto sex is rape. Also she has women’s only classes no mixed classes.
I agree - just because I haven't been exposed up close and personal to the crime issues, doesn't mean they don't happen.
I was only trying to make a point by way of comparison.
I also agree about the men thing - as I knew quite a few men who were utter a-holes towards women back when I was younger. I think the difference is that there isn't a bunch of male molesters out there with a "movement" and a political party to back them up. If there was - a bunch of other *men* would likely tell them to STFU. Which is exactly the point I was making to CowGirlup . It sucks - but if women want to be TRULY equal to men - that means they have to start policing the nutbags in their ranks. Since the women have created the political / social situation where it's now for all practical purposes impossible for men to do so.
And yet she still has a well paid job - filling college student's heads with that crap.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
- Messages
- 210
- Likes
- 288
Never heard of MGTOW before this thread, but couldnt help but wonder... Haven't we seen something similar before? ![[laugh]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/012.gif "Laugh [laugh]")
SpaceCritter
NES Member
Hearsay many years after the fact, yet.
The "tell" in all this, to me, is her inability to remember when it happened. For most people, high school is four years. (For some, five, for me, three. Nevertheless...) Traumatic events have a way of sticking in one's mind, and in the context of high school, in relation to where you were then. I've had a few (teen-standard) traumatic things happen to me then, and even if I couldn't specify an exact date, could say with certainty, "Such-and-such happened the summer before freshman year" or "THAT happened late October or early November when I was a sophomore."
The committee erred badly in handling this. The moment it looked to become a dog-and-pony, a Congressional subpoena should have been issued to Ford to testify, and to Feinstein's office to produce, unredacted, the letter - "shall hereby appear..." "fail ye not..." etc - as information material to the matter at hand. Thus, she either: (a) testifies and provides something of relevance, (b) testifies and provides nothing ("I cannot recall" etc.), (c) perjures herself, or (d) does the Fifth shuck-and-jive. B and D most likely. Bluff would've been called, ample opportunity granted to tell her side, and this "trial by innuendo" nipped.
Similar threads
