So, after getting through half of the match, an SO brings up that he doesn't think the extended slide stop on the shooters gun is legal, and refers him to the MD.. The shooter asked where that rule was written, and the MD couldn't produce it, so he called it a judgement call, and DQ'd the shooter.. I have heard of some f'd up things happening at the indoor competition last year, which was one of the big reasons I didn't even attempt to go, but really?? If there is a rule, blatant, or overlooked, fine, shooters problem, but if someone decided they didn't like this guy when they saw him, and decided to implement a non-existent rule halfway through, that is f'd up. I mean if it is a rule, how did it get by the previous SO's? If I paid $130.00 and was DQ'd for a rule you can't even produce, I would be causing such a scene..