Just a Little Tease: Comm2A's New Project

Comm2A

Director Comm2a
Dealer
NES Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
168
Likes
1,256
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Here's a little tease regarding the announcement we're making tomorrow. Would anyone like to guess as to the significant of the document attached here?

It's not too late to say YOU helped to support this project.
 

Attachments

  • VV Receipt.pdf
    962.6 KB · Views: 1,136
Last edited:
Wait wait don’t tell me.......

Actually please tell me!

I won’t relay what’s on that pdf but in my short knowledge I really want to know what this means.
 
I always feel completely lost on things like this. I have no idea what possible MA law is being contested based on the shared document.
 
pay for play? holy shit, burn them.

also, donation inbound

Edit: I think it's inbound....but got no confirmation

Village Vault is providing kickbacks to local PD’s? Do tell!

Are you guys going to bring down the bonded storage scam?

Would this mean a local PD sold confiscated or surrendered guns to VV for store credit to buy things like sbr’s, sbs’s, no list unobtainables??
 
Bonded warehouse =scam..
The more I read up on this and the guys involved.
The more I understood how it involves getting free guns, ammo and magazines from the outrageous storage fees allowed!

Or just totally screwing over a citizen by holding his firearms hostage until he pays an unheard of fee for there return!

Not to mention the condition of them upon there return..

Nothing like some good old fashioned pilfering of the public!
 
Last edited:
Would this mean a local PD sold confiscated or surrendered guns to VV for store credit to buy things like sbr’s, sbs’s, no list unobtainables??

If you look at the receipt, it looks like the PD is "getting a cut" in the form of a kickback, of the proceeds of the guns retrieved when sold, or hell, given the amount of extortion VV puts on the guns, a couple months of storage is enough to easily give the PD say a 10-20% cut of that and still have a lot left over.

As far as what they used that money for, it could be anything. Dowd could be turning that credit into guns, or for that matter, selling them margarita machines, etc.

-Mike
 
Last edited:
Such filthiness. I’d like to see some criminal charges. This is insane.

Unfortunately, a quick search on NES shows that this Judge Saylor IV is not one to help our cause. We’ll see how this plays out.
 
Great find and post, Drix.

1 Filed: 6/27/2018, Entered: None


COMPLAINT against Donna M. McNamara, Brian Holmes, James O'Connor, Village Gun Shop, Inc., filed by Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., Mykel Powell. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet and Category Form, # 2 Exhibit)(Danieli, Chris) (Entered: 06/27/2018)
No calendar events were found for this docket.

The amended complaint is even better. These are RICO claims... [rockon]
 
I always feel completely lost on things like this. I have no idea what possible MA law is being contested based on the shared document.
They are going after a business that thrives on extortion. They are scum bags. Good enough for me

VV=extortion specialists. POS
 
This creates an obvious incentive for PDs to be obstructionist in the legal transfer of guns to third parties, and make a 'hurry up' call to the VV.
 
An article in the Lowell Sun from 2006 pretty much explains how the scam works. In fact, EOPS was also responsible for failing to define the rules and regulations for tracking guns that go to bonded warehouses, according to the article. Have changes been made since them for tracking guns? The answer appears to be no.

Also, wasn't this the basis for Jarvis vs. Village Vault?

Massachusetts has the toughest gun laws in the country. Yet eight years after legislators tightened laws to better track firearms, the Executive Office of Public Safety has no records on hundreds of guns seized annually by police from alleged domestic abuse cases.

"It's sort of murky, in short," said Andrew Plunkett, spokesman for EOPS. "There isn't a provision in the law that says police have to report the number of weapons seized to any central, statewide database. There's no one-stop shopping for this information."

The state says it is not bound by law to track seized firearms, but the main author behind the Gun Control Act of 1998 said the public-safety office should have known better.

"The bill was for gun reform. If we haven't been able to monitor where secondary or third guns go, there's a problem," said Rep. Paul Casey, D-Winchester.

Casey said it was EOPS' job to define the rules and regulations governing bonded public warehouses -- a provision entered into the 1998 legislation to give police and gun owners a safe and secure place to store firearms.

State not tracking seized weapons
 
Back
Top Bottom