What’s the outrage about? Non violent drug crime. Accepted a plea. Legal permanent resident. I’m not seeing the problem.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
What’s the outrage about? Non violent drug crime. Accepted a plea. Legal permanent resident. I’m not seeing the problem.
Dealing with what? It's no rain on my parade-I have no stake in this at all. A drug sale is an aggravated felony and there is no relief from removal for a conviction as far as I know.Oh, if it were only that easy. Even felons get to stay if the judge says so. Yeah, he'll be picked up, but the judge is a whole different ballgame. Sorry to rain on your parade, but it's what I've been dealing with for a couple of years now.
What’s the outrage about? Non violent drug crime. Accepted a plea. Legal permanent resident. I’m not seeing the problem.
Not here for us working class taxpayers but maybe it can be found in Utopia.To maintain legal permanent status, you must remain legal. No criminal activity, no criminal convictions. He broke the law. Should be in prison, should be deported.
Full stop.
There's a lot wrong with that article and much going on behind the scenes there. First the prosecutor reduced the crime from trafficking which has a mandatory prison sentence to possession with intent to distribute. That permitted the defendant to go unagreed with the prosecutor on a plea. Everyone involved knew that he was going to avoid jail time and that it was pure grandstanding for the masses to ask for prison let alone jail. Second, the main reason is because the guy will definitely be removed from the US at some point due to the conviction. He can not stay legally in the US now. Pretty soon he'll be picked up by immigration when he comes to court to see his probation officer. It's an aggravated felony for immigration purposes and that's a wrap. It's all a set up. Commonwealth doesn't pay to incarcerate and avoids a trial but gets rid of defendant.
What’s the outrage about? Non violent drug crime. Accepted a plea. Legal permanent resident. I’m not seeing the problem.
Dealing with what? It's no rain on my parade-I have no stake in this at all. A drug sale is an aggravated felony and there is no relief from removal for a conviction as far as I know.
You seem angry at me about this. Why? I'm interested in learning the legal basis for how a person with an aggravated felony conviction avoids removal. I'm not an immigration lawyer but deal with it all the time and I'm told by experienced immigration attorneys that a valid aggravated felony is a dead end.What I'm f'ing telling you is that there IS relief from removal. All an Immigration Judge needs to do is accept a stay of deportation. Without a felony conviction it's harder. This cat should have a double whammy against him, 'drugs' + 'felony', now he only has drugs. It's not a guarantee of removal.
You seem angry at me about this. Why? I'm interested in learning the legal basis for how a person with an aggravated felony conviction avoids removal. I'm not an immigration lawyer but deal with it all the time and I'm told by experienced immigration attorneys that a valid aggravated felony is a dead end.
these judges need to be fired or impeached or jailed or all of the above.
I'll settle for beaten in the town square. What an ass.
My suggestions were really just to get the ball rolling. All other suggestions are welcome....lol
******Twisted logic.
Deal H? No problem! Own a legally-purchased bump stock, 20 years in PMITA Prison for you!!Outrageous, i wonder how mmany ODs or deaths this scumbag has caused