Judge may allow Sandy Hook "victims" to sue Glock

[Ben Cartwright SASS]

Latest from Reuters

Hmm, AR15's have no civilian purpose, well then so do cars that can go faster than 65 MPH

The lawsuit, filed in December 2014 and seeking unspecified financial damages, said the AR-15 assault weapon used in the attack that killed 20 young children and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut, should never have been sold because it had no reasonable civilian purpose.

Also leave it to Mass and CT to blame the legal owners

Even as Connecticut and neighboring states tightened their rules, other states rejected new curbs on gun ownership.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-connecticut-shooting-idUSKCN0VV1WX

 

[allen-1]

Latest from Reuters

Hmm, AR15's have no civilian purpose, well then so do cars that can go faster than 65 MPH



Also leave it to Mass and CT to blame the legal owners






http://www.reuters.com/article/us-connecticut-shooting-idUSKCN0VV1WX

And that ladies and gentlemen is one of the three reasons that my home is now in Georgia. I can blame the taxes on the government too, the weather isn't their fault.

 

[Shark_Cage]

Latest from Reuters

Hmm, AR15's have no civilian purpose, well then so do cars that can go faster than 65 MPH



Also leave it to Mass and CT to blame the legal owners






http://www.reuters.com/article/us-connecticut-shooting-idUSKCN0VV1WX

Don't forget those scary scoped sniper rifles. No civilian needs them either. You could kill a cop with one...

 

[Ben Cartwright SASS]

Don't forget those scary scoped sniper rifles. No civilian needs them either. You could kill a cop with one...

and golf clubs, ask Michael Kennedy Smith...